返回列表
💰投资 · 💬 讨论题 · 🧠 阿头学

全天候投资组合不是万能药,但它比“拿现金+瞎择时”更像靠谱底座

达利欧这篇文章对“多数人不该重仓现金、也不该自信择时”的判断基本正确,但把全天候组合包装成近乎普适解明显说过了,尤其淡化了杠杆、相关性失效和时代红利这三个关键风险。
打开原文 ↗

2026-03-24 原文链接 ↗
阅读简报
双语对照
完整翻译
原文
讨论归档

核心观点

  • 反现金、反择时,这个前提成立 作者判断长期现金并不安全、绝大多数人也做不好市场择时,这两点都站得住脚,因此“先建立一个不依赖择时的核心组合”是比主观押方向更成熟的投资思路。
  • 全天候的本质是系统设计,不是单一产品 文章最有价值的地方,是把投资从“买什么”提升到“如何让组合在不同宏观环境下不失控”,这个判断比常见的60/40叙事更进一层,因为它关注的是组合层面的韧性而不是单资产故事。
  • 风险平价是亮点,也是最大争议点 达利欧强调要按风险而不是按资金做配置,这个思路很强,因为它揭示了传统组合表面分散、实则风险集中;但他刻意淡化了实操通常离不开杠杆这一事实,这不是技术细节,而是普通投资者能不能承受的生死线。
  • “任何环境都有效”是过度承诺 全天候组合的逻辑依赖资产在不同增长/通胀象限中能够相互对冲,但2022年股债双杀已经证明,这种相关性并不稳定,所以把它说成“任何环境下都均衡”并不严谨,甚至带误导。
  • 这更适合作为Beta底仓,不适合作为信仰 文中把全天候定义为长期持有的战略配置,这个定位是合理的;但如果把它理解成无需再判断环境、无需再管成本、无需再管实现难度的终极方案,那就把工程问题误读成宗教答案了。

跟我们的关联

1. 对 ATou 意味着什么、下一步怎么用 这篇文章最值得 ATou 吸收的不是具体配方,而是“不要把系统成败建立在持续做对高频判断上”。下一步可以把这个原则迁移到产品和投资上:先定义核心底仓,再把主动押注限制在可承受范围内。 2. 对 Neta 意味着什么、下一步怎么用 对 Neta 的启发是“表面平均分配不等于真正平衡”,真正要看的是风险贡献和相关性。下一步可以把“风险平价”翻译成资源配置框架,检查当前项目/资产/渠道是否只是看起来分散,实际上押在同一因子上。 3. 对 Uota 意味着什么、下一步怎么用 对 Uota 来说,这篇文章说明“全天候”是一种应对不确定性的系统工程思维,而不是金融黑话。下一步可以借用“增长/通胀四象限”方法,改造为自己的情境矩阵,做内容、产品或决策时先找脆弱性再谈优化。 4. 对三者共同意味着什么、下一步怎么用 这篇文章共同提醒的一点是:Beta和Alpha必须分开,底座求稳,进攻求散。下一步最实际的用法,是先明确什么是“必须长期持有的核心配置”,再明确什么是“允许犯错的战术试验”,不要把两者混在一起。

讨论引子

1. 如果风险平价的实现高度依赖杠杆,那它到底还是不是“大多数投资者都适用”的方案? 2. 2022年已经暴露出股债相关性失效,全天候框架该被修正,还是只是碰到了短期逆风? 3. 在投资之外,团队管理或产品组合里,什么才对应“按风险分配而不是按资源平均分配”?

人生走到这个阶段,最主要的目标,是把过去 60 年里学到、对自己有用、也相信能帮到别人的原则传递出去。能讲给别人的投资原则里,我认为最重要的一部分,是关于什么是全天候投资组合,以及如何构建这样的组合。我觉得这些原则在像现在这样风险更高的时期尤其有价值。

对我来说,*对大多数投资者而言最重要的,是拥有一个投资组合:a)经过良好分散与工程化设计,能以尽可能低的风险获取尽可能高的回报;b)不需要做市场择时。原因在于:a)虽然大多数人认为最安全的投资是现金(例如短期政府债务,或几乎无违约风险、类似的计息存款工具,比如高质量货币市场基金),因为它不会违约,但从长期看,这类现金投资几乎必然带来最低的税后回报,而且在高通胀时期会尤其糟糕,也就是会损失大量购买力。也同样真实的是:b)几乎所有投资者(包括许多资历深厚的专业投资者)即便自以为能做到,也无法有效地择时市场。基于这个原因,我认为对大多数自行管理投资组合的投资者来说,投资应该尽量少择时,甚至不择时。

*全天候投资组合是一种被动持有的投资组合,它由多类投资构成,目标是在任何环境下,都能获得明显高于现金等低风险资产的回报,同时承担的风险又显著低于股票、债券等高风险资产。它不同于大多数常见组合,例如 60/40 的股债配比,或那些在景气时表现很好、在不景气时表现很差的投资。为避免误解,需要说清楚:全天候投资组合指的是能实现这种效果的一类组合,它不是某个投资产品。它更像是 一项金融工程挑战:要实现这种平衡,而这种平衡又可以催生投资产品。我的全天候投资组合是按我的方式构建的,我会在这里简要说明,并在后面更全面地展开。自然地,我的方法也随着时间不断演进与改进,而且我还想到了一些继续把它做得更好的办法。但任何人都可以用自己的方式把它“工程化”出来,也许我应该办个比赛来比比谁的方案最好。

我先讲讲我是怎么想出这一套方法的,以及它是怎么运作的。

大约 30 年前,我在尝试创建一套策略,让我的家人在我不在之后也能在不需要我指导的情况下进行投资。我认为我需要一个投资组合:a)能提供显著高于现金的回报(也就是至少等同于或高于经典的 60/40 股债组合),b)风险要低于 60/40 组合,c)不应在任何一种特定经济环境下暴露出明显的糟糕表现,d)不需要做市场择时。

在我看来,获得这种全天候组合的唯一办法,是持有多种能带来更高回报、但也更高风险的投资,并让它们彼此分散,从而作为整体实现同样的更高回报,却比任何单一资产单独持有时承担更低的风险,因为这些资产类别会相互分散。为了得到更好的分散,我提出了“风险平价”的概念:把风险不同(也就是波动率不同)的投资,通过提高低风险/低波动投资的风险/波动、降低高风险/高波动投资的风险/波动,让它们的风险水平更接近,从而更好地相互平衡。随后,我根据每个资产类别回报背后最根本的驱动因素,来平衡我对各资产类别的敞口。换句话说,只要知道每类资产如何应对通胀、增长等经济条件的变化(例如通胀与增长上升时债券表现不佳,而黄金、通胀保值债券和大宗商品等通胀对冲资产表现良好),并在通胀与增长上升和下降的环境中配置等量风险,我就能构建一个被动的战略配置组合,使其在所有经济情景下都保持良好均衡。30 年过去了,我仍然认为拥有这种核心的战略组合至关重要。我的全天候投资组合,就是我会持续持有的、理想的“贝塔”(资产类别)战略资产配置组合。与此同时,我也会基于我认为哪些会表现好、哪些会表现差而做许多战术性押注来创造“阿尔法”,但那些是通过构建一个高度分散的阿尔法组合来完成的,我把它称为“纯阿尔法”方法。(这个方法现在不展开解释,否则会偏题太远。)

我和我优秀的桥水团队一起把这套全天候方法搭建出来,尤其是和 Bob Prince、Greg Jensen 一起完成。他们分别在桥水工作了 40 年和 30 年,如今仍是那里的联席首席投资官。我们做出来之后,我发现它足够直接,几乎任何人都能实施,我很难想象会有人愿意付费让我们替他们做这种管理。所以我把它的做法几乎教给了我认识的每一个人(这也是我现在仍想做的事),但让我意外的是,很多客户反而希望我们帮他们用这套策略管理资金。我们把它作为一项产品推出,当然,它此后也持续演进和改进。现在桥水以他们自己的方式在做,并不断进化以变得更好;我也以我自己的方式在做,并不断进化以变得更好。我们之间的差别在于,他们为他人管理全天候账户,而我只为我的家庭和家族基金会这样做,同时把方法教给别人。

无论投资者是自己搭建全天候投资组合,还是让别人替他们搭建,我最希望的是,人们能理解它的运作方式,并有机会将其应用到自己的投资中,从而确信自己可以获得不错的回报,同时又不至于在大多数人认为糟糕的市场或经济环境里遭遇不可接受的表现。我写过很多关于我如何配置全天候组合的内容,也广泛分享过。(例如,如果你想系统学习我的投资原则,可以通过我与新加坡 Wealth Management Institute 合作制作的线上课程在这里获取 <WMI Online Course>。)无论如何,我很快会把我的“配方”写出来,更清楚地说明你如何构建属于自己的全天候投资组合,并在合适的时候把它分享出来。

I am at a stage in life where my main objective is to pass along to others the principles I have learned over the last 60 years that have helped me and that I think can help others. I believe that some of the most important investment principles I can pass along are about what an “All Weather Portfolio” is and how to build such a portfolio. I think these principles are especially valuable during risky times like now.

人生走到这个阶段,最主要的目标,是把过去 60 年里学到、对自己有用、也相信能帮到别人的原则传递出去。能讲给别人的投资原则里,我认为最重要的一部分,是关于什么是全天候投资组合,以及如何构建这样的组合。我觉得这些原则在像现在这样风险更高的时期尤其有价值。

To me, *the most important thing for most investors to have is a portfolio that is a) well diversified/engineered so that it delivers the highest possible return with the least amount of risk and b) does not require market timing. That is because a) while most people think the safest investment is cash (e.g., short-term government debt or nearly default-free analogous interest-bearing deposits like high quality money market funds) because it won't default, those cash investments will certainly give the lowest after-tax returns over time, and they will be especially bad—i.e., lose a lot of purchasing power—in periods of high inflation. It is also true that b) almost all investors (including most well-established professional investors) cannot time the market effectively even when they think they can. For that reason, I believe that for most investors managing their own portfolios, investing should be done with little or no market timing.

对我来说,*对大多数投资者而言最重要的,是拥有一个投资组合:a)经过良好分散与工程化设计,能以尽可能低的风险获取尽可能高的回报;b)不需要做市场择时。原因在于:a)虽然大多数人认为最安全的投资是现金(例如短期政府债务,或几乎无违约风险、类似的计息存款工具,比如高质量货币市场基金),因为它不会违约,但从长期看,这类现金投资几乎必然带来最低的税后回报,而且在高通胀时期会尤其糟糕,也就是会损失大量购买力。也同样真实的是:b)几乎所有投资者(包括许多资历深厚的专业投资者)即便自以为能做到,也无法有效地择时市场。基于这个原因,我认为对大多数自行管理投资组合的投资者来说,投资应该尽量少择时,甚至不择时。

*An All Weather portfolio is a passively held mix of investments that is expected to have a return that is much higher than the return on low-risk assets like cash but with much less risk than higher-risk assets like stocks and bonds, in any environment. This is unlike most portfolios, such as the 60/40 stock/bond mix or investments that do well when times are good and badly when times are bad. So, to be clear, an All Weather portfolio is a type of portfolio that achieves that; it is not an investment product. It is more like a financial engineering challenge to achieve that balance, which can produce investment products. My All Weather Portfolio has been built my way, which I will describe in brief here and more comprehensively later. Naturally, my approach has evolved and improved over time, and I have some ideas for how to make it better still. But anyone can engineer their own way of achieving it—maybe I should have a contest to build the best approach.

*全天候投资组合是一种被动持有的投资组合,它由多类投资构成,目标是在任何环境下,都能获得明显高于现金等低风险资产的回报,同时承担的风险又显著低于股票、债券等高风险资产。它不同于大多数常见组合,例如 60/40 的股债配比,或那些在景气时表现很好、在不景气时表现很差的投资。为避免误解,需要说清楚:全天候投资组合指的是能实现这种效果的一类组合,它不是某个投资产品。它更像是 一项金融工程挑战:要实现这种平衡,而这种平衡又可以催生投资产品。我的全天候投资组合是按我的方式构建的,我会在这里简要说明,并在后面更全面地展开。自然地,我的方法也随着时间不断演进与改进,而且我还想到了一些继续把它做得更好的办法。但任何人都可以用自己的方式把它“工程化”出来,也许我应该办个比赛来比比谁的方案最好。

I will start by telling you about how I came up with my approach and how it works.

我先讲讲我是怎么想出这一套方法的,以及它是怎么运作的。

About 30 years ago, I was trying to create a strategy that my family could use to invest without my guidance after I was gone. I believed that I needed a portfolio that a) would deliver a significantly higher return than cash (i.e., equal to or above the classic 60/40 stock and bond portfolio), b) would have less risk than the 60/40 mix, c) would not be exposed to doing badly in any particular type of economic environment, and d) would not require market timing.

大约 30 年前,我在尝试创建一套策略,让我的家人在我不在之后也能在不需要我指导的情况下进行投资。我认为我需要一个投资组合:a)能提供显著高于现金的回报(也就是至少等同于或高于经典的 60/40 股债组合),b)风险要低于 60/40 组合,c)不应在任何一种特定经济环境下暴露出明显的糟糕表现,d)不需要做市场择时。

As I saw it, the only way I could get this All Weather portfolio was by holding diversifying higher-returning, higher-risk investments that together would have the same higher returns with lower risk than any of them would have individually because of how these asset classes would diversify each other. To get that better diversification, I came up with the concept of “risk parity,” which means taking investments of different risks (i.e., different volatilities) and getting them to have similar risks by increasing the risk/volatility of the low-risk/low-volatility investments and decreasing the risk/volatility of high-risk/high-volatility investments so that they would balance each other better. I then balanced my exposures to each asset class based on the most fundamental drivers of its returns. In other words, by knowing how each asset class responds to changing economic conditions like inflation and growth (e.g., bonds do badly when inflation and growth rise while inflation-hedge assets like gold, inflation-indexed bonds, and commodities do well) and having equal amounts of risk in rising and falling inflation and growth environments, I could create a passive strategic allocation mix that would be well balanced for all economic scenarios. Thirty years later, I still believe that having this core strategic mix is essential. My All Weather Portfolio is my ideal strategic asset allocation mix of “betas” (asset classes) that I constantly hold. While I take a lot of tactical bets based on what I think is going to do well and poorly to create “alpha,” those are done by creating a well-diversified portfolio of alphas that I call my “Pure Alpha” approach. (I won’t explain that approach now as it would be too long a digression.)

在我看来,获得这种全天候组合的唯一办法,是持有多种能带来更高回报、但也更高风险的投资,并让它们彼此分散,从而作为整体实现同样的更高回报,却比任何单一资产单独持有时承担更低的风险,因为这些资产类别会相互分散。为了得到更好的分散,我提出了“风险平价”的概念:把风险不同(也就是波动率不同)的投资,通过提高低风险/低波动投资的风险/波动、降低高风险/高波动投资的风险/波动,让它们的风险水平更接近,从而更好地相互平衡。随后,我根据每个资产类别回报背后最根本的驱动因素,来平衡我对各资产类别的敞口。换句话说,只要知道每类资产如何应对通胀、增长等经济条件的变化(例如通胀与增长上升时债券表现不佳,而黄金、通胀保值债券和大宗商品等通胀对冲资产表现良好),并在通胀与增长上升和下降的环境中配置等量风险,我就能构建一个被动的战略配置组合,使其在所有经济情景下都保持良好均衡。30 年过去了,我仍然认为拥有这种核心的战略组合至关重要。我的全天候投资组合,就是我会持续持有的、理想的“贝塔”(资产类别)战略资产配置组合。与此同时,我也会基于我认为哪些会表现好、哪些会表现差而做许多战术性押注来创造“阿尔法”,但那些是通过构建一个高度分散的阿尔法组合来完成的,我把它称为“纯阿尔法”方法。(这个方法现在不展开解释,否则会偏题太远。)

I built out this All Weather approach with my great Bridgewater team, especially with Bob Prince and Greg Jensen, who have been at Bridgewater for 40 and 30 years, respectively, and are still co- Chief Investment Officers there. After we built it, I saw that it was straightforward enough that practically anyone could implement it, and I couldn’t imagine we would be paid for managing others' money to do it. So, I showed just about everyone I knew how to do it (which is something I still want to do) and was surprised when many clients asked us to manage money in that strategy. We launched it as a product, and, naturally, it has evolved and improved since then. Bridgewater is now doing it in their own ways and evolving it to make it better, and I’m also doing it my own way and evolving it to make it better. The difference between us is that they are managing All Weather accounts for others, and I’m doing it just for my family and my family’s foundation and showing others how to do it.

我和我优秀的桥水团队一起把这套全天候方法搭建出来,尤其是和 Bob Prince、Greg Jensen 一起完成。他们分别在桥水工作了 40 年和 30 年,如今仍是那里的联席首席投资官。我们做出来之后,我发现它足够直接,几乎任何人都能实施,我很难想象会有人愿意付费让我们替他们做这种管理。所以我把它的做法几乎教给了我认识的每一个人(这也是我现在仍想做的事),但让我意外的是,很多客户反而希望我们帮他们用这套策略管理资金。我们把它作为一项产品推出,当然,它此后也持续演进和改进。现在桥水以他们自己的方式在做,并不断进化以变得更好;我也以我自己的方式在做,并不断进化以变得更好。我们之间的差别在于,他们为他人管理全天候账户,而我只为我的家庭和家族基金会这样做,同时把方法教给别人。

Whether investors build their All Weather portfolios themselves or have someone else do it for them, what I most want is for people to understand how it works and have the opportunity to apply it so that they can be confident they can have good returns without being exposed to unacceptably bad performance in what most people think are bad market/economic environments. I have written a lot about how I make my All Weather portfolio mix, and I have distributed that widely. (For example, if you want a complete course about my investment principles, you can get it here <WMI Online Course> through an online course I built with Singapore’s Wealth Management Institute).  In any case, I will soon write up my “recipe” that will make clearer how you can build your own All Weather portfolio, and I will pass it along when I get a chance.

无论投资者是自己搭建全天候投资组合,还是让别人替他们搭建,我最希望的是,人们能理解它的运作方式,并有机会将其应用到自己的投资中,从而确信自己可以获得不错的回报,同时又不至于在大多数人认为糟糕的市场或经济环境里遭遇不可接受的表现。我写过很多关于我如何配置全天候组合的内容,也广泛分享过。(例如,如果你想系统学习我的投资原则,可以通过我与新加坡 Wealth Management Institute 合作制作的线上课程在这里获取 <WMI Online Course>。)无论如何,我很快会把我的“配方”写出来,更清楚地说明你如何构建属于自己的全天候投资组合,并在合适的时候把它分享出来。

I am at a stage in life where my main objective is to pass along to others the principles I have learned over the last 60 years that have helped me and that I think can help others. I believe that some of the most important investment principles I can pass along are about what an “All Weather Portfolio” is and how to build such a portfolio. I think these principles are especially valuable during risky times like now.

To me, *the most important thing for most investors to have is a portfolio that is a) well diversified/engineered so that it delivers the highest possible return with the least amount of risk and b) does not require market timing. That is because a) while most people think the safest investment is cash (e.g., short-term government debt or nearly default-free analogous interest-bearing deposits like high quality money market funds) because it won't default, those cash investments will certainly give the lowest after-tax returns over time, and they will be especially bad—i.e., lose a lot of purchasing power—in periods of high inflation. It is also true that b) almost all investors (including most well-established professional investors) cannot time the market effectively even when they think they can. For that reason, I believe that for most investors managing their own portfolios, investing should be done with little or no market timing.

*An All Weather portfolio is a passively held mix of investments that is expected to have a return that is much higher than the return on low-risk assets like cash but with much less risk than higher-risk assets like stocks and bonds, in any environment. This is unlike most portfolios, such as the 60/40 stock/bond mix or investments that do well when times are good and badly when times are bad. So, to be clear, an All Weather portfolio is a type of portfolio that achieves that; it is not an investment product. It is more like a financial engineering challenge to achieve that balance, which can produce investment products. My All Weather Portfolio has been built my way, which I will describe in brief here and more comprehensively later. Naturally, my approach has evolved and improved over time, and I have some ideas for how to make it better still. But anyone can engineer their own way of achieving it—maybe I should have a contest to build the best approach.

I will start by telling you about how I came up with my approach and how it works.

About 30 years ago, I was trying to create a strategy that my family could use to invest without my guidance after I was gone. I believed that I needed a portfolio that a) would deliver a significantly higher return than cash (i.e., equal to or above the classic 60/40 stock and bond portfolio), b) would have less risk than the 60/40 mix, c) would not be exposed to doing badly in any particular type of economic environment, and d) would not require market timing.

As I saw it, the only way I could get this All Weather portfolio was by holding diversifying higher-returning, higher-risk investments that together would have the same higher returns with lower risk than any of them would have individually because of how these asset classes would diversify each other. To get that better diversification, I came up with the concept of “risk parity,” which means taking investments of different risks (i.e., different volatilities) and getting them to have similar risks by increasing the risk/volatility of the low-risk/low-volatility investments and decreasing the risk/volatility of high-risk/high-volatility investments so that they would balance each other better. I then balanced my exposures to each asset class based on the most fundamental drivers of its returns. In other words, by knowing how each asset class responds to changing economic conditions like inflation and growth (e.g., bonds do badly when inflation and growth rise while inflation-hedge assets like gold, inflation-indexed bonds, and commodities do well) and having equal amounts of risk in rising and falling inflation and growth environments, I could create a passive strategic allocation mix that would be well balanced for all economic scenarios. Thirty years later, I still believe that having this core strategic mix is essential. My All Weather Portfolio is my ideal strategic asset allocation mix of “betas” (asset classes) that I constantly hold. While I take a lot of tactical bets based on what I think is going to do well and poorly to create “alpha,” those are done by creating a well-diversified portfolio of alphas that I call my “Pure Alpha” approach. (I won’t explain that approach now as it would be too long a digression.)

I built out this All Weather approach with my great Bridgewater team, especially with Bob Prince and Greg Jensen, who have been at Bridgewater for 40 and 30 years, respectively, and are still co- Chief Investment Officers there. After we built it, I saw that it was straightforward enough that practically anyone could implement it, and I couldn’t imagine we would be paid for managing others' money to do it. So, I showed just about everyone I knew how to do it (which is something I still want to do) and was surprised when many clients asked us to manage money in that strategy. We launched it as a product, and, naturally, it has evolved and improved since then. Bridgewater is now doing it in their own ways and evolving it to make it better, and I’m also doing it my own way and evolving it to make it better. The difference between us is that they are managing All Weather accounts for others, and I’m doing it just for my family and my family’s foundation and showing others how to do it.

Whether investors build their All Weather portfolios themselves or have someone else do it for them, what I most want is for people to understand how it works and have the opportunity to apply it so that they can be confident they can have good returns without being exposed to unacceptably bad performance in what most people think are bad market/economic environments. I have written a lot about how I make my All Weather portfolio mix, and I have distributed that widely. (For example, if you want a complete course about my investment principles, you can get it here <WMI Online Course> through an online course I built with Singapore’s Wealth Management Institute).  In any case, I will soon write up my “recipe” that will make clearer how you can build your own All Weather portfolio, and I will pass it along when I get a chance.

📋 讨论归档

讨论进行中…