返回列表
🪞 Uota学 · 🧠 阿头学 · 💬 讨论题

别再围着聊天机器人打转,真正的 AI 硬仗在"缺人又要命"的世界里

这篇最值钱的不是"物理 AI 很重要",而是一个更狠的判断:AI 最该去吃的,不是最炫的需求,而是长期供给断裂、代价极高、没人愿意持续做的缺口。
打开原文 ↗

2026-03-10 原文链接 ↗
阅读简报
双语对照
完整翻译
原文
讨论归档

核心观点

  • "补缺口"比"秀能力"更像真机会 Qasar 最有穿透力的点,不是自动驾驶本身,而是他抓住了一个机会筛选器:当一个任务长期缺人、危险、低意愿、高成本时,AI 的价值就不是锦上添花,而是系统级补位。这个框架对 agent、社交、出海都成立。相比"模型更强了",我更认同"供给缺口更重要"——前者容易卷进同质化,后者更接近支付意愿和长期护城河。
  • "物理世界才是真革命"有洞察,但被他说得太满 用工业革命视角看 AI 是对的,它能把注意力从 demo 拉回产业结构、生命安全和生产率,尤其是文中提到美国每年超 30,000 人死于车祸,这类问题的确比"写邮件更快"更硬。但把未来 5-10 年的"真正革命"几乎押注在物理世界,仍然过于绝对。软件侧 AI 已经在重写大量工作流,而物理 AI 的落地速度、监管、资本开支和责任链复杂度都高得多。这条不是错,是"方向对,表达过头"。
  • 关于就业,他说中了一半,另一半被利益立场遮住了 "很多岗位早就没人愿意干"这件事是真的,运输、农业、护理、危险作业都存在结构性供给不足,这比空泛谈"AI 抢饭碗"更接近现实。但把它进一步说成"AI 不是取代,只是填补缺口",就开始偷换概念了。总量缺口存在,不代表局部岗位不会被替代、压价、重组。尤其当技术成熟后,资本一定会从"补缺"外溢到"提效替代"。这是本文最该防着读的地方。
  • 对创始人的真正要求不是聪明,是"品味 + 去滤镜" 这篇里最被低估的是第 6、8、9 点。Qasar 对"无菌室创业者"的批判很准:没在复杂组织底层挨过打的人,很容易做出精致但失真的判断。品味不是审美,是接触过足够复杂、粗糙、低效的人类现实后形成的判断力。再叠加"独立判断看是否收敛"的去噪方法,以及"从已经有效的行为中提炼价值观",这三点组合起来,其实是一套高质量组织操作系统,比鸡血式 founder 建议强太多。
  • "低调潜行"和"第一次创业当练习"都对,但只适合有缓冲垫的人 这两条在硅谷语境里很迷人,但不能直接拿来当普适真理。低调是优势,前提是你已有网络、客户入口或圈层信用;否则"低调"常常只是"没人知道你存在"。把第一次创业当 0 分练习也有价值,它能帮人卸掉过度执念,但对多数没有资本兜底的人来说,三年不是练习,是生存成本。所以这两条应该当"条件成立时的策略",不是无脑信条。

跟我们的关联

🧠Neta

  • 把产品叙事从"AI 很聪明"改成"补上情感供给缺口" 这意味着 Neta 不该把自己包装成"替代真实社交",而应更明确地占住"人在最需要回应时,现实里没人稳定在线"的缺口。接下来可以重写一版海外 landing page 和投放文案,核心测试"companionship gap / always-available support"而不是模型炫技。
  • 出海竞品分析要先看约束条件,不要只看功能表 这意味着你们比较对手时,不能只比留存、功能、价格,还要看对手靠什么活:资本补贴、渠道绑定、品牌信任、政策红利、社区文化。接下来把海外主要竞品按"目标函数与约束"重分组,而不是按产品类别分组。

🪞Uota

  • 把"供给缺口优先"做成 agent 选题原则 这意味着 agent 不该优先解决"能做但没那么痛"的任务,而要优先做"人持续做不好、做不起、做不久"的场景。接下来可把当前 agent/skill backlog 过一遍,按"长期缺口强度 × 替代成本 × 付费意愿"重新排序。
  • 把"独立收敛测试"嵌入关键决策流程 这意味着团队遇到重大问题时,不要先群聊对齐。接下来可在国家选择、功能优先级、品牌打法上试一次:让 3 个核心成员先独立给答案,再比较分歧来自信息差、风险偏好还是老板偏好。

👤ATou

  • 你的短板可能不是 AI 使用深度,而是"经验带宽" 这意味着想成为 top 0.0001% 的 AI 指挥官,不只是多会调模型、多会搭工作流,还要建立对不同用户阶层、不同文化语境、不同组织摩擦的高分辨率理解。接下来可以刻意补两类输入:一类是非互联网行业的一线访谈,另一类是海外普通用户的长期观察,而不是继续只泡在 AI 圈信息流里。

讨论引子

  • Neta 到底是在"替代一部分真实社交",还是在"填补真实社交供给不足"? 这不是文案问题,而是产品伦理、增长叙事和长期监管风险问题。你怎么定义自己,决定了你吸引什么用户,也决定了未来会被怎么批评。
  • 对于一个 20 人特种作战团队,品牌建设到底该多高调? Qasar 说低调是优势,但你们 2026 又明确要做海外增长和品牌宣发。那就得选:哪些曝光是真增长杠杆,哪些只是创始人幻觉中的存在感?
  • 关键决策应该追求"独立判断后收敛",还是保留足够大的非共识空间? 如果太追求收敛,可能压掉了真正有价值的异见;如果太鼓励非共识,小团队又容易失焦。对 Neta 这种资源有限但又要做新市场探索的团队,边界该怎么划?
  1. 未来 5 到 10 年,真正的 AI 革命将发生在物理世界,而不是软件世界。当所有人都在痴迷于 ChatGPT、Claude 和编码代理时,真正的影响将来自自动驾驶车辆、采矿机器人与农业设备。它们将拯救生命(美国每年有超过 30,000 人死于车祸),让残障人士获得出行能力,缓解那些危险且无人愿意从事的行业的劳动力短缺,等等。

  2. AI 并不是在运输、农业等行业取代工作岗位——它只是恰好在劳动力缺口早已存在之际赶到,用来填补空缺。美国农民的平均年龄在五十多岁末。长途卡车司机岗位招不到人,并不是因为人们做不了,而是因为这种取舍不再划算;一个家庭完全可以选择 DoorDash 或 Uber,这样家长还能去接孩子。Qasar 认为,物理世界的 AI 将补上由人口结构变化与偏好转变造成的缺口,而不是挤走那些愿意从事这些角色的劳动者。他也谨慎地指出,这并不意味着没有代价;只是“AI 来抢你的饭碗”这种叙事,忽略了更迫在眉睫的现实。

  3. 拿中国的 AI 公司去和美国的 AI 公司直接对比,是一种范畴错误。Qasar 以华为为例:公司的名字大致意为“中国的雄心”,约四分之一的员工是共产党员,其目标不是扩大利润,而是扩展国家的影响力。因此,当人们说中国电动车正在打败底特律时,他们是在把一个有政府背书、没有利润约束的实体,拿来与像 Rivian 这样一亏损就会被公开市场投资者猛锤的公司相提并论。Qasar 说,如果美国公司也能同样摆脱利润预期的束缚,也能拿出相当的产品。重点并不是中国无能,或不是一个严肃的竞争对手;而是大多数人使用的对比框架本身就错了。

  4. 理解 AI 的最佳心智模型,是工业革命。正如 19 世纪末带来了童工与垄断,但也让人们前所未有地获得医疗、供暖、制冷以及物质商品,AI 也会在带来巨大收益的同时产生必须正视的副作用。关键在于:不要为了保护工作岗位而对技术猛踩刹车——那样最伤害的,恰恰是你最想帮助的人。要寻找既照顾到劳动者、又能让进步继续发生的解决方案。

  5. 低调潜行地打造产品,可能就是你的竞争优势。Qasar 在几乎没有社交媒体存在感的情况下,打造 Applied Intuition 近十年。公司早期的核心价值观之一是:“我们最好的工作,是独自且安静地完成的。”他的理由是:花在播客、发帖或面向公众的内容上的每一分钟,都是从客户与产品身上挪走的一分钟。Qasar 也补充了一个重要的但书——他之所以能保持低调,是因为他在生态圈里本就有名。对没有既有人脉网络的创始人来说,可能需要借助公开露面带来的可见度。

  6. Qasar 认为,大多数硅谷 CEO 缺乏品味——无论是艺术意义上的品味,还是做出良好运营决策的品味——原因在于他们的生活经验过于狭窄。一个在 Cupertino 长大、上 Berkeley,然后立刻创业的人,从未体验过在一个 100,000 人组织的最底层工作是什么滋味。Qasar 在通用汽车(GM)和博世(Bosch)工作了十多年,他说那段经历——官僚主义、糟糕的工具、与一线脱节的领导层——直接塑造了他今天如何领导 Applied Intuition。他更大的观点是:品味来自对广阔人类经验的接触——背包旅行、阅读古老的书、在不同文化与行业中工作。

  7. 成功的公司几乎总会在早期就显露出牵引力。如果你做了两年,市场仍然没有给你越来越具体的“该做什么”的信号,考虑重置。根基可能一开始就错了——合伙人、市场,或你所处的人生阶段。你的第一次创业是练习;把它当作锻炼“成为创始人”的肌肉,而不是你的一生代表作。

  8. 情绪是一层会扭曲决策的滤镜;目标应是把这层滤镜移开,让决策的“原始画面”呈现出来。Qasar 并不是说领导者不该有同理心;他指的是对自己想法的执着、想要证明自己正确的欲望,以及部落本能般去追随最响亮声音的冲动——这些都是情绪带来的失真。他给出一个实用的启发式原则:同一个决策题,分别独立地交给公司里的多个人去判断,应该得出同样的结果。如果做不到,就说明有某种情绪滤镜在扭曲信号。这也呼应了他更广泛的理念:打造一种文化,让最好的想法胜出,不论提出者是谁、资历多深。

  9. 关于公司价值观,Qasar 的建议是:不要用哲学式的方式凭空发明。相反,把能解释“为什么你的公司已经成功”的 5 到 10 件事写下来,它们就会成为你的价值观。Applied Intuition 的价值观包括:“快,但要安全”,“绝不让客户失望”,“技术精通”,“高产出很重要”,“多笑一点”,以及“有一半的工作是跟进”。

  10. 把你的第一次创业当作 0 分——一场练习赛,而不是命运的定局。Qasar 告诉那些从 Applied Intuition 离开去创业的创始人:他们的前三年很可能一无所获,但这没关系。创业是一门手艺,就像木工。如果你做的第一张桌子摇摇晃晃,你不会因此退出——你会再做一张。他认为许多创始人,尤其是第一次创业的人,把“立刻成功”的压力压得太重,反而错过了这段经历真正的价值:学习,以及锻炼那块肌肉。他自己的第三家公司迄今最为成功,且他一次又一次地看到这种模式在重复出现。也正因如此,有些基金干脆只押注于多次创业者。

My biggest takeaways from @qasar:

  1. The real AI revolution over the next 5 to 10 years will happen in the physical world, not in software. While everyone obsesses over ChatGPT, Claude and coding agents, the real impact will come from autonomous vehicles, mining robots, and farming equipment. They’ll save lives (over 30,000 die annually in U.S. car accidents), enable mobility for disabled people, solve labor shortages in dangerous industries where nobody wants to work, and much more.

  2. AI isn’t replacing jobs in industries like trucking and farming—it’s arriving just in time to fill a labor gap that already exists. The average age of a farmer in the U.S. is in the late 50s. Long-haul trucking jobs go unfilled not because people can’t do them but because the tradeoff isn’t worth it anymore; a family can choose DoorDash or Uber so the parent can pick up their kid. Qasar’s view is that physical AI will fill gaps created by demographic shifts and changing preferences, not displace workers who want those roles. He’s careful to say this doesn’t mean there are no downsides, but that the framing of “AI is coming for your job” misses the more immediate reality.

  3. Comparing Chinese AI companies to American AI companies is a category error. Qasar uses Huawei as his example: the company’s name means “China’s ambition,” roughly a quarter of its employees are Communist Party members, and its goal is not to grow profits but to extend the state. So when people say Chinese EVs are outcompeting Detroit, they’re comparing a government-backed entity with no profit constraint to companies like Rivian that get hammered by public investors for losing money. Qasar says that if American companies were freed from profit expectations the same way, they’d field comparable products. The point isn’t that China is incompetent or not a serious competitor; it’s that the comparison framework most people use is wrong.

  4. The Industrial Revolution is the best mental model for AI. Just like the late 1800s brought child labor and monopolies but also unprecedented access to healthcare, heating, cooling, and material goods, AI will have downsides we must address while delivering massive benefits. The key: don’t pump the brakes on technology to protect jobs—that hurts the people you’re trying to help most. Find solutions that account for workers while enabling progress.

  5. Building under the radar can be your competitive advantage. Qasar built Applied Intuition for nearly a decade without a social media presence. One of the company’s early core values was “Our best work is done alone and quietly.” His reasoning: every minute spent on a podcast, a post, or content for public consumption is a minute not spent on customers and the product. Qasar adds an important caveat—he could afford to stay quiet because he was already known in the ecosystem. Founders without an existing network may need the visibility that public presence creates.

  6. Qasar thinks most Silicon Valley CEOs lack taste—both in the artistic sense and in the sense of making good operational decisions—because their life experience is too narrow. A founder who grew up in Cupertino, went to Berkeley, and immediately started a company has never experienced what it’s like to be at the bottom of a 100,000-person organization. Qasar spent over a decade at GM and Bosch and says that experience—the bureaucracy, the bad tools, the disconnected leadership—directly informs how he leads Applied Intuition today. His broader point is that taste comes from exposure to a wide range of human experience: backpacking, reading old books, working in different cultures and industries.

  7. Successful companies almost always show traction early. If you’re two years in and the market isn’t giving you increasingly specific signals about what to build, consider resetting. The foundation might be wrong—co-founders, market, or life phase. Your first startup is practice; treat it as building the muscle of being a founder, not as your magnum opus.

  8. Emotions are a filter that distorts decision-making, and the goal should be to remove that filter so the “raw image” of the decision comes through. Qasar doesn’t mean leaders shouldn’t have empathy; he means that attachment to your own idea, the desire to be right, and the tribal instinct to follow the loudest voice are all emotional distortions. His practical heuristic: the same decision, presented to multiple people independently in the company, should produce the same result. If it doesn’t, some emotional filter is warping the signal. This connects to his broader philosophy of creating a culture where the best idea wins regardless of who proposed it or how senior they are.

  9. Qasar’s advice on company values: don’t invent them philosophically. Instead, write down the 5 to 10 things that explain why your company is already successful, and those become your values. Applied Intuition’s values include “Move fast, move safe,” “Never disappoint the customer,” “Technical mastery,” “High output matters,” “Laugh a lot,” and “Half of the work is follow-up.”

  10. Treat your first startup as a zero—a practice round, not destiny. Qasar tells founders leaving Applied Intuition to start companies that their first three years will likely produce nothing, and that’s fine. Founding is a craft, like woodworking. If your first table is wobbly, you don’t quit—you build another one. He thinks a lot of founders, especially first-timers, put so much pressure on themselves to succeed immediately that they miss the real value of the experience: learning and building the muscle. His own third company is the most successful by far, and he sees this pattern repeatedly. There are entire funds focused exclusively on multi-time founders for exactly this reason.

  1. 未来 5 到 10 年,真正的 AI 革命将发生在物理世界,而不是软件世界。当所有人都在痴迷于 ChatGPT、Claude 和编码代理时,真正的影响将来自自动驾驶车辆、采矿机器人与农业设备。它们将拯救生命(美国每年有超过 30,000 人死于车祸),让残障人士获得出行能力,缓解那些危险且无人愿意从事的行业的劳动力短缺,等等。

  2. AI 并不是在运输、农业等行业取代工作岗位——它只是恰好在劳动力缺口早已存在之际赶到,用来填补空缺。美国农民的平均年龄在五十多岁末。长途卡车司机岗位招不到人,并不是因为人们做不了,而是因为这种取舍不再划算;一个家庭完全可以选择 DoorDash 或 Uber,这样家长还能去接孩子。Qasar 认为,物理世界的 AI 将补上由人口结构变化与偏好转变造成的缺口,而不是挤走那些愿意从事这些角色的劳动者。他也谨慎地指出,这并不意味着没有代价;只是“AI 来抢你的饭碗”这种叙事,忽略了更迫在眉睫的现实。

  3. 拿中国的 AI 公司去和美国的 AI 公司直接对比,是一种范畴错误。Qasar 以华为为例:公司的名字大致意为“中国的雄心”,约四分之一的员工是共产党员,其目标不是扩大利润,而是扩展国家的影响力。因此,当人们说中国电动车正在打败底特律时,他们是在把一个有政府背书、没有利润约束的实体,拿来与像 Rivian 这样一亏损就会被公开市场投资者猛锤的公司相提并论。Qasar 说,如果美国公司也能同样摆脱利润预期的束缚,也能拿出相当的产品。重点并不是中国无能,或不是一个严肃的竞争对手;而是大多数人使用的对比框架本身就错了。

  4. 理解 AI 的最佳心智模型,是工业革命。正如 19 世纪末带来了童工与垄断,但也让人们前所未有地获得医疗、供暖、制冷以及物质商品,AI 也会在带来巨大收益的同时产生必须正视的副作用。关键在于:不要为了保护工作岗位而对技术猛踩刹车——那样最伤害的,恰恰是你最想帮助的人。要寻找既照顾到劳动者、又能让进步继续发生的解决方案。

  5. 低调潜行地打造产品,可能就是你的竞争优势。Qasar 在几乎没有社交媒体存在感的情况下,打造 Applied Intuition 近十年。公司早期的核心价值观之一是:“我们最好的工作,是独自且安静地完成的。”他的理由是:花在播客、发帖或面向公众的内容上的每一分钟,都是从客户与产品身上挪走的一分钟。Qasar 也补充了一个重要的但书——他之所以能保持低调,是因为他在生态圈里本就有名。对没有既有人脉网络的创始人来说,可能需要借助公开露面带来的可见度。

  6. Qasar 认为,大多数硅谷 CEO 缺乏品味——无论是艺术意义上的品味,还是做出良好运营决策的品味——原因在于他们的生活经验过于狭窄。一个在 Cupertino 长大、上 Berkeley,然后立刻创业的人,从未体验过在一个 100,000 人组织的最底层工作是什么滋味。Qasar 在通用汽车(GM)和博世(Bosch)工作了十多年,他说那段经历——官僚主义、糟糕的工具、与一线脱节的领导层——直接塑造了他今天如何领导 Applied Intuition。他更大的观点是:品味来自对广阔人类经验的接触——背包旅行、阅读古老的书、在不同文化与行业中工作。

  7. 成功的公司几乎总会在早期就显露出牵引力。如果你做了两年,市场仍然没有给你越来越具体的“该做什么”的信号,考虑重置。根基可能一开始就错了——合伙人、市场,或你所处的人生阶段。你的第一次创业是练习;把它当作锻炼“成为创始人”的肌肉,而不是你的一生代表作。

  8. 情绪是一层会扭曲决策的滤镜;目标应是把这层滤镜移开,让决策的“原始画面”呈现出来。Qasar 并不是说领导者不该有同理心;他指的是对自己想法的执着、想要证明自己正确的欲望,以及部落本能般去追随最响亮声音的冲动——这些都是情绪带来的失真。他给出一个实用的启发式原则:同一个决策题,分别独立地交给公司里的多个人去判断,应该得出同样的结果。如果做不到,就说明有某种情绪滤镜在扭曲信号。这也呼应了他更广泛的理念:打造一种文化,让最好的想法胜出,不论提出者是谁、资历多深。

  9. 关于公司价值观,Qasar 的建议是:不要用哲学式的方式凭空发明。相反,把能解释“为什么你的公司已经成功”的 5 到 10 件事写下来,它们就会成为你的价值观。Applied Intuition 的价值观包括:“快,但要安全”,“绝不让客户失望”,“技术精通”,“高产出很重要”,“多笑一点”,以及“有一半的工作是跟进”。

  10. 把你的第一次创业当作 0 分——一场练习赛,而不是命运的定局。Qasar 告诉那些从 Applied Intuition 离开去创业的创始人:他们的前三年很可能一无所获,但这没关系。创业是一门手艺,就像木工。如果你做的第一张桌子摇摇晃晃,你不会因此退出——你会再做一张。他认为许多创始人,尤其是第一次创业的人,把“立刻成功”的压力压得太重,反而错过了这段经历真正的价值:学习,以及锻炼那块肌肉。他自己的第三家公司迄今最为成功,且他一次又一次地看到这种模式在重复出现。也正因如此,有些基金干脆只押注于多次创业者。

相关笔记

  1. The real AI revolution over the next 5 to 10 years will happen in the physical world, not in software. While everyone obsesses over ChatGPT, Claude and coding agents, the real impact will come from autonomous vehicles, mining robots, and farming equipment. They’ll save lives (over 30,000 die annually in U.S. car accidents), enable mobility for disabled people, solve labor shortages in dangerous industries where nobody wants to work, and much more.

  2. AI isn’t replacing jobs in industries like trucking and farming—it’s arriving just in time to fill a labor gap that already exists. The average age of a farmer in the U.S. is in the late 50s. Long-haul trucking jobs go unfilled not because people can’t do them but because the tradeoff isn’t worth it anymore; a family can choose DoorDash or Uber so the parent can pick up their kid. Qasar’s view is that physical AI will fill gaps created by demographic shifts and changing preferences, not displace workers who want those roles. He’s careful to say this doesn’t mean there are no downsides, but that the framing of “AI is coming for your job” misses the more immediate reality.

  3. Comparing Chinese AI companies to American AI companies is a category error. Qasar uses Huawei as his example: the company’s name means “China’s ambition,” roughly a quarter of its employees are Communist Party members, and its goal is not to grow profits but to extend the state. So when people say Chinese EVs are outcompeting Detroit, they’re comparing a government-backed entity with no profit constraint to companies like Rivian that get hammered by public investors for losing money. Qasar says that if American companies were freed from profit expectations the same way, they’d field comparable products. The point isn’t that China is incompetent or not a serious competitor; it’s that the comparison framework most people use is wrong.

  4. The Industrial Revolution is the best mental model for AI. Just like the late 1800s brought child labor and monopolies but also unprecedented access to healthcare, heating, cooling, and material goods, AI will have downsides we must address while delivering massive benefits. The key: don’t pump the brakes on technology to protect jobs—that hurts the people you’re trying to help most. Find solutions that account for workers while enabling progress.

  5. Building under the radar can be your competitive advantage. Qasar built Applied Intuition for nearly a decade without a social media presence. One of the company’s early core values was “Our best work is done alone and quietly.” His reasoning: every minute spent on a podcast, a post, or content for public consumption is a minute not spent on customers and the product. Qasar adds an important caveat—he could afford to stay quiet because he was already known in the ecosystem. Founders without an existing network may need the visibility that public presence creates.

  6. Qasar thinks most Silicon Valley CEOs lack taste—both in the artistic sense and in the sense of making good operational decisions—because their life experience is too narrow. A founder who grew up in Cupertino, went to Berkeley, and immediately started a company has never experienced what it’s like to be at the bottom of a 100,000-person organization. Qasar spent over a decade at GM and Bosch and says that experience—the bureaucracy, the bad tools, the disconnected leadership—directly informs how he leads Applied Intuition today. His broader point is that taste comes from exposure to a wide range of human experience: backpacking, reading old books, working in different cultures and industries.

  7. Successful companies almost always show traction early. If you’re two years in and the market isn’t giving you increasingly specific signals about what to build, consider resetting. The foundation might be wrong—co-founders, market, or life phase. Your first startup is practice; treat it as building the muscle of being a founder, not as your magnum opus.

  8. Emotions are a filter that distorts decision-making, and the goal should be to remove that filter so the “raw image” of the decision comes through. Qasar doesn’t mean leaders shouldn’t have empathy; he means that attachment to your own idea, the desire to be right, and the tribal instinct to follow the loudest voice are all emotional distortions. His practical heuristic: the same decision, presented to multiple people independently in the company, should produce the same result. If it doesn’t, some emotional filter is warping the signal. This connects to his broader philosophy of creating a culture where the best idea wins regardless of who proposed it or how senior they are.

  9. Qasar’s advice on company values: don’t invent them philosophically. Instead, write down the 5 to 10 things that explain why your company is already successful, and those become your values. Applied Intuition’s values include “Move fast, move safe,” “Never disappoint the customer,” “Technical mastery,” “High output matters,” “Laugh a lot,” and “Half of the work is follow-up.”

  10. Treat your first startup as a zero—a practice round, not destiny. Qasar tells founders leaving Applied Intuition to start companies that their first three years will likely produce nothing, and that’s fine. Founding is a craft, like woodworking. If your first table is wobbly, you don’t quit—you build another one. He thinks a lot of founders, especially first-timers, put so much pressure on themselves to succeed immediately that they miss the real value of the experience: learning and building the muscle. His own third company is the most successful by far, and he sees this pattern repeatedly. There are entire funds focused exclusively on multi-time founders for exactly this reason.

📋 讨论归档

讨论进行中…