返回列表
🧠 阿头学 · 🪞 Uota学 · 💬 讨论题

如何真正快速学会任何东西(并删除你的记笔记系统)

真正的学习不是死记硬背的输入,而是由具体项目目标驱动、以输出为导向的控制论反馈过程;传统的“第二大脑”多为虚荣的数字坟墓,AI 时代应构建基于语义检索的“第二潜意识”来服务创作。
打开原文 ↗

2026-07-27 原文链接 ↗
阅读简报
双语对照
完整翻译
原文
讨论归档

核心观点

  • 学习是控制论的输出过程 学习依赖负反馈回路:明确的目标产生误差信号,误差信号建立信息过滤器,过滤器筛选出高相关性内容,最终自然形成记忆留存,而非被动囤积通用知识。
  • 用“项目驱动”取代“先学后做” 任何不能直接推动当前项目前进的知识都不值得刻意学习;应以具体产出为框架,在遇到实际阻碍时去寻找“特定知识(Specific Knowledge)”。
  • 从“第二大脑”升级为“第二潜意识” 传统笔记软件让人死于手动分类和关键词检索,真正的知识库应像达芬奇的摘录本一样作为创作燃料,利用 AI 向量嵌入(Embeddings)按“意义距离”自动关联和浮现想法。
  • AI 的价值在于消除摩擦而非代笔 AI 比“一袋湿锤子还笨”,不应让其代替人类表达核心信念与观点,而应利用其处理大数据的能力来做结构辅助、灵感检索和研究润色。
  • 高转化创作的“表现×兴奋”交集法则 优质选题应建立在“已被市场验证的高表现话题(Performance)”与“创作者个人好奇的独特视角(Excitement)”的交集之上。

跟我们的关联

  • 对 ATou 意味着什么、下一步怎么用:ATou 在做技术探索或产品研发时,应警惕“为了学 AI 而学 AI”的通识囤积;下一步应直接立项一个具体的交付目标,仅在遇到工程卡点时按需检索特定知识,建立负反馈学习闭环。
  • 对 Neta 意味着什么、下一步怎么用:Neta 在做内容营销和海外增长时,不能仅凭主观自嗨选题;下一步应使用“表现×兴奋”公式,先抓取利基市场的离群爆款话题,再注入团队独有的反共识观点进行降维打击。
  • 对 Uota 意味着什么、下一步怎么用:Uota 在设计 AI 知识管理或 Agent 产品时,应放弃让用户手动打标签和维护分类法的旧范式;下一步应将产品重心放在底层 Embedding 语义空间映射上,实现“静默收集、按需自动浮现”的第二潜意识体验。

讨论引子

1. 在医学、法律或基础科学等高度依赖系统性“通用知识”和记忆的硬核学科中,纯粹的“项目驱动学习法(PBL)”是否会导致严重的知识碎片化和认知偏差? 2. 当我们高度依赖 AI 语义检索(“第二潜意识”)来为创作提供灵感关联时,人类的深度思考能力究竟是被释放了,还是在不知不觉中被算法的“意义空间”限制了边界? 3. 如何在团队管理中应用“控制论学习模型”,让缺乏主动性的员工建立起内在的“误差信号”,从而实现自发的问题修正与技能成长?

If you need to remember it, it’s not important. If it’s important, you will remember it.

如果你需要刻意去记,那它就不重要。如果它重要,你就会记住。

不知何故,记住你读过的所有内容已经成为一种执念。有数百个关于此的视频,播放量达数百万。

人们觉得如果他们没有保留从阅读中获得的知识,他们就是失败者,或者浪费了时间,但这根本不是阅读的意义所在。

你究竟为什么要背诵一本书的每一个字呢?

我知道为什么。

你想显得很聪明。

对你来说,这是一种无意识的身份象征。

你想用你的口才和智慧给别人留下深刻印象,但你没有意识到,显得聪明源于理解,而不是死记硬背,而且理解需要一种完全不同的学习方法。学校测试你的记忆能力也无济于事。你学习数小时只是为了能填上正确答案。这不是生活的运作方式。

我明白。

你想获取知识,以便做出更好的决策,让自己进入一个更有利的生活处境,拥有更多的金钱和权力,这样你就不用担心日常的生存问题。每个人都想要这些,但记忆事实是达到目的最无效的方式。

这就是我们要首先讨论的——如何以一种真正能留存下来的方式获取知识,这样你就能为自己创造一个更美好的未来。

然后,我们将讨论为什么你的记笔记系统、书签,甚至你珍贵的“第二大脑”(精神自慰者的充气娃娃)在很大程度上是无用的。

如果你对自我推销过敏,请跳过这部分直接阅读文章其余部分:

说到第二大脑,我们刚刚在 Eden 中添加了 Library(图书馆)、Reader(阅读器)和 Highlights(高亮)功能。现在,你不仅可以研究创作者的顶级内容并找到你的下一个爆款话题(以及安排发布帖子),还可以建立一个相互关联的帖子、链接和想法的图书馆,Eden 会为你整理这些内容——并允许你根据含义而不仅仅是关键词进行搜索。

此外,你可以保存任何 Substack 文章、X 文章或 YouTube 视频,阅读文字记录并高亮显示,这样你就永远不会丢失一个想法。

我们还没有完全开始在公开场合大力推广 Eden,但我们的用户一直在大声疾呼它对创意人员和创作者来说是多么大的一个颠覆者。

在此处获取 4 个月免费使用权和免费 Creator Bootcamp(创作者训练营)(通常价值 $499)。

如何真正快速学会任何东西

https://eden.so/

大多数人不知道如何学习。

因为大多数人不知道学习过程是什么。

大多数学习失败的原因是没有负反馈回路。

这样想。

如果你没有保持身材的目标(我说的是深层内在生成的目标,而不是为了合群而追求的表面目标,比如新年决心),那么一夜的酗酒和派对就不会被记录为一个问题(负反馈),因为它不会影响你第二天晨跑或健身房锻炼的不存在的目标。你可以带着宿醉去上班,因为你根本不在乎你的工作表现如何。

学习是一个控制论过程。

控制论听起来像与赛博格有关的东西,但它源于希腊语单词 kybernētēs,意思是舵手或掌舵人。驾驶船只的人。

选择“控制论”这个词是因为舵手是反馈系统的完美形象。舵手不仅仅是一次性地将船向一个方向,他会不断读取当前状态(风、浪、航向),将其与预期航线进行比较,并进行调整。换句话说,就是试错的过程,而很少有人拥有能让他们注意到生活中错误的方向。

控制论阐明了智能系统的属性。

https://eden.so/?utm_source=thedankoe&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=social_evergreen&utm_content=x_article

  1. 参考信号(目标) – 系统持有目标状态。

  2. 传感器(感知) – 系统读取其当前状态。

  3. 比较器(差距) – 系统计算目标与当前状态之间的差异。该差异即为误差信号。

  4. 执行器(行为) – 系统采取行动以减少误差。

就像恒温器在太冷时会打开暖气,或者你的胰腺在血糖升高时会释放胰岛素一样。

这很好地揭示了问题所在。

当大多数人尝试学习新东西时,他们专注于内容。他们囤积材料,并试图通过间隔重复、抽认卡、课程和学习基础知识来吸收它。他们假设学习是一个 输入 过程。

实际上,学习是一个输出过程,因为输出需要输入。

目标产生误差信号。

误差信号产生过滤器。

过滤器产生相关性(大多数人脑子里装满了噪音和他们永远不会用到的的东西)。

相关性产生记忆留存。

一个一生都被条件反射式地设定为上学和找工作这一近乎无意识目标的人,自然会朝着那个方向学习和行动。他们被分配的命运将不可避免地成为现实。

那些被深度设定为走默认道路的人甚至不会注意到工作之外的赚钱机会,因为他们的大脑正在将其过滤掉。他们出生时被分配的宏大人生目标决定了他们的行为和学习。他们是别人理想的傀儡。他们无法掌控自己的生活。

但是,如果你通过确切地知道你不想要什么,并将其与你确实想要的生活的不断演变的愿景进行比较,从而有意识地创造自己的框架,你才能在偏离轨道时有所察觉,注意到错误,纠正你前进的方向,并作为副产品进行学习。

很有道理,但你实际上该怎么做?

步骤 1) 对一个有意义的目标变得痴迷。

变得痴迷的方法是审视你当前的行为,并意识到如果你不改变,你的生活最终会走向何方。

对于大多数人来说,那个结局并不美好。

与那个形象共处,让它充满强烈的情绪,并将这种情绪能量重新导向对你生活更好的方向。

只有那样,你才能真正将你追求的目标与你未来的宗旨保持一致。只有那时,一个有用的学习过程才开始,这与学校教育相反,在学校里,你的学习是由社会为你设定的方向和目标决定的。

走极端会改变你的大脑并增强神经可塑性。在我看来,做出一个极端的改变比做出许多微小的改变要好得多。

破釜沉舟。改变你的生活。

2) 不要开始学习。

你想要的生活在于一系列有意义的项目终点。

你的思想应该被视为一个项目。你的身体、人际关系和经济状况也是如此。一个项目只是一个结构化的目标和里程碑集合。一个项目为你的学习创造了一个框架(通过过滤不重要的噪音)。任何不能直接推动项目前进的东西都不值得学习(目前),因为反正你也留不住。

换句话说,当你想学新东西时,不要开始学习,而是迈出实现目标的第一步。

3) 寻求特定知识。

I ultimately think that everyone should be figuring out what it is that they uniquely do best—that aligns with who they are fundamentally, and that gives them authenticity, that brings them specific knowledge, that gives them competitive advantage, that makes them irreplaceable. And they should just lean into that. And sometimes you don’t know what that is until you do it.

我最终认为每个人都应该弄清楚他们独特地做得最好的是什么——这与他们根本上的自我相一致,赋予他们真实性,带给他们特定知识,赋予他们竞争优势,使他们不可替代。他们应该只是倾注于此。有时你不知道那是什么,直到你去做了。

– Naval

学校教授通用知识,或从事工作所需的知识。

它们不教你如何开辟自己的道路。它们将你局限在一个研究领域,这在本质上并没有让你准备好通过创业之路——或者仅仅是做你想做的事——来指导你自己的工作。

自我教育是学习实现自我生成目标所需内容的过程。再次强调,不要囤积通用知识来感觉自己在学习。

举个例子,假设我想学习 After Effects——动画软件。

去看一堆通用的 After Effects 教程并学习关于该软件的每一个小细节是愚蠢的。

相反,你需要对你想要构建的项目有一个愿景。

你用你现有的知识开始项目,如果你没有知识,那么你找一个与你想要创建的项目尽可能相似的具体教程。

现在,既然你有了过滤器(你想要创建什么),大部分教程将是无用的,但你会找到一个小技巧,让你至少可以开始项目。

你应用它,然后重复,直到你积累了如此多的技巧,当你去创建下一个项目时,然后再下一个,它会变得越来越容易。

学习吉他或乐器也是如此。

你不是去学习乐理。

选择一首你想演奏的歌。

然后你学习这首歌的第一个和弦。然后是第二个。然后是第三个。最终你学会了以特定的方式调音,你学会了一些让你演奏得更好的小窍门。

在学习了几首歌之后,你会觉得你似乎可以创作你自己的简单歌曲了。

那就是你学习的方式。

第二潜意识(删除你的记笔记系统)

我以前尝试过所有的系统,而且我很喜欢它们。我从 Roam Research 开始,它彻底改变了我的写作方式。我建立了一个包含有力想法的知识库,每次我坐下来在屏幕上写字时都会从中提取。

几年前,我甚至构建了 Kortex,它本意不是做第二大脑软件,但在它不可避免地失败之前,它最终变成了那样。嗯,它并没有真正失败,但它痛苦地演变成了 Eden,后者已成为市场上寻找社交媒体趋势(针对创作者)和从任何地方捕捉想法(针对创意人员)的最佳工具。

所以,我不是来说第二大脑无用的。

我只是认为它们被误用了

你收藏书签和记笔记,结果它们再也没被看过。你确实浪费了时间,以为自己在学习,而其实你本可以真正地学习,正如我们讨论的那样。

在过去,人们没有一个营销良好的流行“第二大脑”。他们有一本摘录本

Marcus Aurelius 的书《沉思录》本质上是一本私人摘录本,里面有给自己的笔记和消化的哲学。它本无意出版。

Leonardo da Vinci 填满了数千页的笔记本,里面有素描、观察、问题和借用的想法。

Mark Twain、H.P. Lovecraft、Thomas Jefferson、Ronald Reagan、Montaigne、Rick Rubin 以及更多人都各有某种变体。

但是,普通的第二大脑狂热者与他们之间有一个主要区别。

他们收集的想法是他们创作的燃料

他们的发明、写作和音乐不会是今天这个样子,我甚至敢说,如果他们没有某种形式的摘录本,你甚至都不会知道那些名人是谁。

当你创造某样东西时,你的潜意识会吐出相关的想法,这些想法有助于创作的质量,但它的处理能力仍然有限,有时它决定根本不帮你,让你陷入创作瓶颈。

Seneca 使用的一个比喻是从许多花朵中采集花粉,然后将其消化成你自己的蜂蜜。

用现代的话说,像艺术家一样偷窃。

这是写作瓶颈的解药。你没有写作、内容或视频的想法,是因为你没有一个可以提取的想法库。我在这封信中写的每一件事都来自文章、视频、社交帖子、随机想法和我之前保存的高亮。

我想你明白了,但我们究竟如何构建它?

我们如何创建一个数字摘录本,或第二潜意识,让我们可以在一生中构建它,而不会变成一个杂乱无章的记笔记应用程序,让你的想法在那里消亡?

步骤 1) 选择正确的软件,或创建你自己的 AI 系统

Don’t get breathless about how “smart” AI is. It’s dumber than a sack of wet hammers.

不要对 AI 有多“聪明”感到气喘吁吁。它比一袋湿锤子还笨。

Leverage, instead, its ability to do rapid input and output for simple tasks on large datasets.

相反,利用它在大型数据集上快速执行简单任务的输入和输出能力。

– Devon Eriksen

大多数记笔记和“第二大脑”软件仍然需要手动维护。

有些软件附加了 AI 聊天功能,这绝对有用,但它们错过了所有应用中最有用的一个:确保你的想法不会消失在虚空中——因为你的创意工作取决于你重新浮现它们的能力。

你这里有两个选择。

我们的目标是有一个可以投放想法的地方,并能轻松地为我们的项目重新浮现正确的想法。

  • 选项 1 - 使用像 Claude Code + Obsidian 这样的组合,将你的知识存储在一个地方,并使用 AI 检索想法

  • 选项 2 - 使用像 MyMind 或 Eden 这样的软件,它们会自动标记、分类并将你的知识嵌入“意义空间”,以便它能连接看似无关的想法,从而产生新颖的见解

互联网上有很多关于选项 1 的教程。它现在非常流行,因为人们把他们珍贵的 Notion 模板集合换成了 Claude 技能集合(一种会像所有潮流一样消退的时尚),但这里是如何自己动手做的 80/20 法则:

  1. 下载 Obsidian 和 Claude

  2. 打开 Claude Code 或 Claude Cowork,并选择你电脑上的 Obsidian 库文件夹作为你正在工作的文件夹

  3. 创建一个“保存想法”技能——让 claude 创建一个技能,在收件箱文件夹中创建一个带有清晰标题的笔记

  4. 创建一个“处理我的收件箱”技能——让 claude 创建一个技能,遍历你的收件箱文件夹,添加标签,将其移动到正确的文件夹,并在库中添加指向其他相关笔记的反向链接

  5. 让 Claude 帮你定义你的分类法,以便它知道使用什么标签/类别

这允许你将想法、笔记和知识捕获到一个久经考验的记笔记工具中。

然后,你可以随时让 Claude“搜索我的库中与[我正在写的想法]相关的所有内容。”

这对寻找大多数想法有效,但好的写作和创意工作来自新颖的连接,而不是关键词搜索或 AI 头脑风暴同义词来查找相关匹配。

如果你不想手动做所有这些,你可以使用像 MyMind 这样的软件,它允许你将任何链接或想法保存到一个大的可搜索图书馆中。

Eden 做同样的事情(你可以快速将任何东西捕获到你的图书馆中),但更进一步。当你保存一个链接,比如 Substack 文章或 YouTube 视频时,它会转录它,并允许你高亮显示它。此外,你可以与 Kindle 集成,拉取所有以前的高亮——这些是强有力的创意燃料。

MyMind 和 Eden 与 Obsidian 和 Claude 的不同之处在于,你添加到图书馆的所有内容都会自动标记、分类和嵌入。所以你可以做 Claude 允许你做的同样的搜索,而不会浪费宝贵的 AI 使用量(如果你确实想用 Claude 构建和访问你的知识库,Eden 也有 MCP)。此外,如果你是作家或创作者,Eden 有一个离群值搜索流,你可以在其中找到你的利基市场中表现良好的社交帖子,并将它们直接保存到你的图书馆。

我不完全确定 MyMind 是否这样做,但对于 Eden,它的不同之处还在于它可以基于含义进行搜索。

Obsidian 可以向你展示“什么是相关的”,Eden 可以向你展示“什么是附近的”,因为每个想法都嵌入了约 1500 个数字,充当想法的 GPS 坐标。即使它们共享零个相同的词,也能找到它们。这就是允许你只需将想法投入其中并忘记它的原因,因为你知道你会在需要时准确找到它。

它可以提取新颖的连接,而无需每次都重新搜索你的整个知识库,从而节省数十万个 AI Token。

你可能不想维护向量数据库、嵌入 API、索引脚本、在笔记更改时重新嵌入、在文件重命名或删除时保持索引同步,以及缓存以免为未更改的内容重新付费。

所有工具都免费这样做,但如果你想要一个真正的“第二潜意识”,可以在写作、创作或构建项目时进行研究——Eden 可能值得一试。

步骤 2) 捕捉最能代表你理想思维的想法

既然你有一个可以投放想法而不用担心组织的地方(因为我们刚刚解决了组织问题,你只有在想以后找到它们时才组织),你不要只是把所有东西都扔进去。

当 AI 可以创造任何东西时,策展比以往任何时候都重要。

你需要一个精心策划的空间,存放那些激发灵感的想法。这与我们称之为社交媒体流的无尽噪音消防水管相反。

作为一名作家、创作者或试图做独立工作的人(意味着你需要通过吸引人们关注你发布的想法来建立受众),人们不再为你的内容关注你。

有 Google、AI 和大量只需点击按钮就能找到的信息。

他们关注你是为了你的观点。你的看法。你的解读。你的个性。你的故事。所有这些都源于构成你世界观的那些想法。你用来理解世界的那些想法。

举个例子,当我参与关于现实本质的对话时,我的思维会跳转到关于历史、整体理论、螺旋动力学等的想法——因为我已经认定这些是我可以用来看待该对话的最有用的透镜。它在我听到的其他往往站不住脚的想法中最有意义。

那些就是你要捕捉的想法。

你策划一套最能代表你理想思维的大型知识集。

因为那就是你花哨的记笔记系统本该成为的样子,对吧?

你只是从来没有通过思考、写作和公开分享来将这些想法巩固为你自己的一部分,这样你就可以从市场获得反馈,让最好的想法胜出。

你怎么做?

你读更多的书。你让你的好奇心引导你。你拒绝末日刷屏,拥抱致力于产生好想法的作者和思想家的精选列表。你为“研究”腾出时间,因为作为作家或创作者,那是你工作的 80%。

你工作的其余部分只是将那些“研究”综合成对他人有益的东西。

步骤 3) 通过创造行为构建你的理想思维

让我们闭环。

我们有了捕捉和检索知识的系统。

但现在我们需要项目来应用它,以免浪费。

而且,我们仍然没有捕捉特定知识,因为我们没有理由去学习。我们没有给我们的头脑提供框架,让它能有效地发出信号表明想法足够重要值得捕捉,正如我们讨论的那样。

这就是我们追求的最终目标,对吧?

我们想变得更聪明。我们想保留并记住我们学到的东西。我们想听起来口齿伶俐。也许是因为肤浅的原因,但也因为我们生活的结果取决于我们做出的决定,而我们的聪明程度和表达我们自身价值的能力绝对对此有积极贡献。

我不能告诉你去创造什么。

但如果你对写作感兴趣,我可以给你一部分我的流程,这最近帮助了其他人。

对于像写 Substack 文章、YouTube 脚本或 X 文章这样的事情,我会这样做:

1) 选择一个话题。

显然。

最好的话题是位于表现和兴奋交集处的那些。

表现 = 已经被证明表现良好的话题。

你通过保存已经爆火的社交帖子,或使用研究工具找到离群内容并研究创作者的顶级帖子来找到这些。

(我现在写的这篇文章是基于“如何记住你读过的所有内容”,这个话题爆火的次数我都数不清了,但我对其应用了我自己的逆向视角)。

兴奋 = 你出于好奇想更多探索的话题和想法。

你的工作是将你想写的话题(可能在社交媒体上表现不佳)与一个已经被证明表现良好的话题配对,这样你可以写你想写的,并增加它实际获得关注的潜力。

这就是大多数初学者失败的地方。

2) 脑力倾倒 → 大纲 → 草稿

还没开始写。

作家不会只是打开一个页面,然后期望所有的想法线性地各就各位。

从脑力倾倒开始。写下所有可能适合你正在写的话题的潜在想法。翻阅你的笔记、想法和链接,并将它们添加到里面。

然后,开始用大纲添加一些结构。拿出脑力倾倒中的所有想法,并尝试将它们放入一个通用的讲故事框架中:问题 → 见解 → 解决方案。

在大纲中的每个部分下组织想法。

然后,打开你的大纲、想法和知识库,准备在将想法串联成实际草稿的形式时从中提取。

3) 使用 AI 来消除摩擦,而不是替你写作。

我会在未来的信中写下我对 AI 写作的看法,但当我说“不要使用 AI 写作”时,我实际上是在说“不要使用 AI 来表达你自己的信念和观点”。

既然 Substack 有了他们的 AI 写作评估器,人们将开始指出某些账户如何在他们的写作中使用 AI。我有几次被指出我的一些文章中有 AI 写作。

别那么迟钝。

是的,在提供纯粹信息时,我会直接从 AI 复制粘贴——比如对 Greuter 的自我发展 9 个阶段的解释,这些信息你会从 Google 搜索中得到。我不会浪费口舌试图用我自己的话重写它,因为那不需要发生。这对我和读者都是一种伤害。

我认为在努力表达你自己的想法和信念方面是有价值的,这是反 AI 人士似乎做不到很好的事情,因为他们被他们的新宗教束缚了思想。

当我说“使用 AI 消除摩擦”时,我是说像你在学习技能时使用课程、导师或编辑那样使用它。

如果你不知道如何构建你的文章,询问一系列你的想法可以融入的结构列表。

如果你不知道接下来写什么,询问文章可以去的几个方向。

如果你不理解某些东西,研究它,就像过去任何作家用效率较低的方法在互联网上搜寻正确信息那样。

总而言之,我相信你有大脑。

最终决定发布什么的人是你。

如果它不代表你想要的价值观、想法和信念,那就完善它,直到它代表为止。

我就说到这里,因为我还有更多话要说,我会留到另一封信里。

– Dan

如果你想写作但不知道从哪里开始,写什么,或关于如何在社交媒体上发展的任何事,请考虑加入这里的训练营。

If you need to remember it, it’s not important. If it’s important, you will remember it.

For some reason, it’s become an obsession to remember everything you read. There are hundreds of videos about it with millions of views.

People feel like if they don’t retain the knowledge from what they read, they're a failure, or they wasted your time, when that’s not the point of reading at all.

Why would you want to memorize every word of a book in the first place?

I know why.

You want to sound smart.

It’s an unconscious status symbol for you.

You want to impress others with your articulation and intelligence, but you don’t realize that sounding smart comes from understanding, not memorization, and understanding requires a much different approach to learning. It also doesn’t help that schools tested you on your ability to memorize. You studied for hours just so you could pencil in the right answer. That’s not how life works.

I get it.

You want to acquire knowledge so that you can make better decisions and work yourself into a more advantageous life situation with more money and power so you don't have to worry about your day-to-day survival. Everyone wants that, but memorizing facts is the least effective way to get there.

That’s what we’ll talk about first - how to acquire knowledge in a way that actually sticks, so you can create a better future for yourself.

Then, we’ll talk about why your note-taking system, bookmarks, and even your precious “second brain” (the sex doll for mental masturbators) are largely useless.

Skip to the rest of the article if you're allergic to self-promotion:

Speaking of second brain, we just added Library, Reader, and Highlights to Eden. Now, not only can you research creators’ top content and find your next viral topic (and schedule posts to be published), but you can build an interconnected library of posts, links, and ideas that Eden organizes for you - and allows you to search based on meaning rather than just keywords.

And, you can save any Substack article, X article, or YouTube video, read the transcript, and highlight so you never lose an idea.

We haven't fully started blasting Eden in public yet, but our users have been vocal about how much of a game-changer it is for creatives and creators.

Get 4 months and the Creator Bootcamp free (normally $499) here.

If you need to remember it, it’s not important. If it’s important, you will remember it.

如果你需要刻意去记,那它就不重要。如果它重要,你就会记住。

不知何故,记住你读过的所有内容已经成为一种执念。有数百个关于此的视频,播放量达数百万。

人们觉得如果他们没有保留从阅读中获得的知识,他们就是失败者,或者浪费了时间,但这根本不是阅读的意义所在。

你究竟为什么要背诵一本书的每一个字呢?

我知道为什么。

你想显得很聪明。

对你来说,这是一种无意识的身份象征。

你想用你的口才和智慧给别人留下深刻印象,但你没有意识到,显得聪明源于理解,而不是死记硬背,而且理解需要一种完全不同的学习方法。学校测试你的记忆能力也无济于事。你学习数小时只是为了能填上正确答案。这不是生活的运作方式。

我明白。

你想获取知识,以便做出更好的决策,让自己进入一个更有利的生活处境,拥有更多的金钱和权力,这样你就不用担心日常的生存问题。每个人都想要这些,但记忆事实是达到目的最无效的方式。

这就是我们要首先讨论的——如何以一种真正能留存下来的方式获取知识,这样你就能为自己创造一个更美好的未来。

然后,我们将讨论为什么你的记笔记系统、书签,甚至你珍贵的“第二大脑”(精神自慰者的充气娃娃)在很大程度上是无用的。

如果你对自我推销过敏,请跳过这部分直接阅读文章其余部分:

说到第二大脑,我们刚刚在 Eden 中添加了 Library(图书馆)、Reader(阅读器)和 Highlights(高亮)功能。现在,你不仅可以研究创作者的顶级内容并找到你的下一个爆款话题(以及安排发布帖子),还可以建立一个相互关联的帖子、链接和想法的图书馆,Eden 会为你整理这些内容——并允许你根据含义而不仅仅是关键词进行搜索。

此外,你可以保存任何 Substack 文章、X 文章或 YouTube 视频,阅读文字记录并高亮显示,这样你就永远不会丢失一个想法。

我们还没有完全开始在公开场合大力推广 Eden,但我们的用户一直在大声疾呼它对创意人员和创作者来说是多么大的一个颠覆者。

在此处获取 4 个月免费使用权和免费 Creator Bootcamp(创作者训练营)(通常价值 $499)。

How to actually learn anything fast

https://eden.so/

Most people have no idea how to learn.

Because most people have no idea what the learning process is.

The reason most learning fails is that there is no negative feedback loop.

Think of it like this.

If you don’t have the goal of getting in shape (and I’m talking a deep intrinsically generated goal not a superficial goal you’re pursuing to fit in, like a new years resolution) then a night of heavy drinking and partying won’t register as a problem (negative feedback), because it doesn’t impact your non-existent goal of performing on your morning run or gym session the next day. You can go to work just fine with a hangover because you don’t give a shit about how well you do at your job.

Learning is a cybernetic process.

Cybernetics sounds like something relating to cyborgs, but it stems from the Greek word kybernētēs, meaning steersman or helmsman. The person who steers the ship.

The word “cybernetics” was chosen because the helmsman is the perfect image of a feedback system. The helmsman doesn’t just point the ship in a direction once, he constantly reads the current state (wind, waves, heading), compares it against the intended course, and adjusts. In other words, the process of trial and error, and so few people have the direction that allows them to notice errors in their life.

Cybernetics illustrates the properties of intelligent systems.

https://eden.so/?utm_source=thedankoe&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=social_evergreen&utm_content=x_article

  1. Reference signal (the goal) – The system holds a target state.

  2. Sensor (perception) – The system reads its current state.

  3. Comparator (the gap) – The system computes the difference between target and current state. The difference is the error signal.

  4. Actuator (behavior) – The system acts to reduce the error.

Like how a thermostat turns on the heat when it gets too cold, or how your pancreas releases insulin when blood sugar rises.

That exposes the issue nicely.

When most people try to learn something new, they focus on content. They hoard material and try to absorb it with spaced repetition, flashcards, courses, and learning the fundamentals. They assume learning is an input process.

In reality, learning is an output process, because output demands input.

A goal creates the error signal.

The error signal creates the filter.

The filter creates relevance (most people fill their mind with noise and things they will never use).

The relevance creates retention.

A person who has been conditioned their entire life to have the nearly unconscious goal of going to school and getting a job will naturally learn and behave in that direction. The destiny they were assigned will inevitably come true.

The person who is deeply conditioned to go down the default path will not even notice money-making opportunities outside of a job, because their brain is filtering it out. The big life goals they were assigned at birth dictate their behavior and learning. They are a puppet of someone else’s ideals. They are not in control of their life.

But if you consciously create your own frame, by knowing exactly what you don’t want out of life and comparing it to an evolving vision of what you do want out of life, you are only then able to sense when you are off track, notice the error, correct the direction you are heading, and learn as a byproduct.

Makes sense, but what do you actually do?

Step 1) Become obsessed with a meaningful goal.

The way you become obsessed is to look at your current actions and realize where your life will end up if you don’t change.

For most people, that outcome is not pretty.

Sit with that image, let it fill you with potent emotion, and redirect that emotional energy toward a better direction for your life.

Only then can you actually align the goals you pursue with the aim of your future. Only then does a useful learning process start, the opposite of schooling, where your learning is determined by the direction and goals society sets for you.

Being extreme changes your brain and enhances neuroplasticity. In my eyes, you’re better off making an extreme change than making a lot of small changes.

Burn the boats. Change your life.

2) Don’t start learning.

The life you want lies at the end of a series of meaningful projects.

Your mind is to be treated as a project. As is your body, relationships, and financial situation. A project is simply a structured set of goals and milestones. A project creates a frame for your learning (by filtering unimportant noise). Anything that does not directly move the project forward is not worth learning (right now), because you won’t retain it anyway.

In other words, when you want to learn something new, don’t start learning, take the first step toward the goal instead.

3) Seek specific knowledge.

I ultimately think that everyone should be figuring out what it is that they uniquely do best—that aligns with who they are fundamentally, and that gives them authenticity, that brings them specific knowledge, that gives them competitive advantage, that makes them irreplaceable. And they should just lean into that. And sometimes you don’t know what that is until you do it.

– Naval

Schools teach general knowledge, or knowledge required to do a job.

They do not teach how to navigate your own path. They narrow you into one area of study, which by nature does not prepare you to direct your own work through the path of entrepreneurship - or simply doing what you want to do.

Self-education is the process of learning what’s necessary to achieve self-generated goals. Again, no hoarding general knowledge to feel like you’re learning.

As an example, let’s say I want to learn After Effects - the animation software.

It would be stupid to go and watch a bunch of general After Effects tutorials and learn every little thing about the software.

Instead, you need a vision for the project you want to build.

You start the project with the knowledge you have, and if you don’t have knowledge, then you find a specific tutorial that is as similar to the project you want to create as it can be.

Now, since you have a filter (what you want to create), most of the tutorial will be useless, but you will find one little technique that allows you to at least start the project.

You apply that and then repeat until you’ve stacked so many techniques that when you go to create your next project, then the next, it becomes easier and easier.

Same with learning the guitar or an instrument.

You don’t go and study music theory.

You choose a song you want to play.

Then you learn the first chord of the song. Then the second. Then the third. And eventually you learn to tune it a specific way, and you pick up little hacks that allow you to play better.

After learning a few songs, you feel as if you could then create your own simple song.

That is how you learn.

如何真正快速学会任何东西

https://eden.so/

大多数人不知道如何学习。

因为大多数人不知道学习过程是什么。

大多数学习失败的原因是没有负反馈回路。

这样想。

如果你没有保持身材的目标(我说的是深层内在生成的目标,而不是为了合群而追求的表面目标,比如新年决心),那么一夜的酗酒和派对就不会被记录为一个问题(负反馈),因为它不会影响你第二天晨跑或健身房锻炼的不存在的目标。你可以带着宿醉去上班,因为你根本不在乎你的工作表现如何。

学习是一个控制论过程。

控制论听起来像与赛博格有关的东西,但它源于希腊语单词 kybernētēs,意思是舵手或掌舵人。驾驶船只的人。

选择“控制论”这个词是因为舵手是反馈系统的完美形象。舵手不仅仅是一次性地将船向一个方向,他会不断读取当前状态(风、浪、航向),将其与预期航线进行比较,并进行调整。换句话说,就是试错的过程,而很少有人拥有能让他们注意到生活中错误的方向。

控制论阐明了智能系统的属性。

https://eden.so/?utm_source=thedankoe&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=social_evergreen&utm_content=x_article

  1. 参考信号(目标) – 系统持有目标状态。

  2. 传感器(感知) – 系统读取其当前状态。

  3. 比较器(差距) – 系统计算目标与当前状态之间的差异。该差异即为误差信号。

  4. 执行器(行为) – 系统采取行动以减少误差。

就像恒温器在太冷时会打开暖气,或者你的胰腺在血糖升高时会释放胰岛素一样。

这很好地揭示了问题所在。

当大多数人尝试学习新东西时,他们专注于内容。他们囤积材料,并试图通过间隔重复、抽认卡、课程和学习基础知识来吸收它。他们假设学习是一个 输入 过程。

实际上,学习是一个输出过程,因为输出需要输入。

目标产生误差信号。

误差信号产生过滤器。

过滤器产生相关性(大多数人脑子里装满了噪音和他们永远不会用到的的东西)。

相关性产生记忆留存。

一个一生都被条件反射式地设定为上学和找工作这一近乎无意识目标的人,自然会朝着那个方向学习和行动。他们被分配的命运将不可避免地成为现实。

那些被深度设定为走默认道路的人甚至不会注意到工作之外的赚钱机会,因为他们的大脑正在将其过滤掉。他们出生时被分配的宏大人生目标决定了他们的行为和学习。他们是别人理想的傀儡。他们无法掌控自己的生活。

但是,如果你通过确切地知道你不想要什么,并将其与你确实想要的生活的不断演变的愿景进行比较,从而有意识地创造自己的框架,你才能在偏离轨道时有所察觉,注意到错误,纠正你前进的方向,并作为副产品进行学习。

很有道理,但你实际上该怎么做?

步骤 1) 对一个有意义的目标变得痴迷。

变得痴迷的方法是审视你当前的行为,并意识到如果你不改变,你的生活最终会走向何方。

对于大多数人来说,那个结局并不美好。

与那个形象共处,让它充满强烈的情绪,并将这种情绪能量重新导向对你生活更好的方向。

只有那样,你才能真正将你追求的目标与你未来的宗旨保持一致。只有那时,一个有用的学习过程才开始,这与学校教育相反,在学校里,你的学习是由社会为你设定的方向和目标决定的。

走极端会改变你的大脑并增强神经可塑性。在我看来,做出一个极端的改变比做出许多微小的改变要好得多。

破釜沉舟。改变你的生活。

2) 不要开始学习。

你想要的生活在于一系列有意义的项目终点。

你的思想应该被视为一个项目。你的身体、人际关系和经济状况也是如此。一个项目只是一个结构化的目标和里程碑集合。一个项目为你的学习创造了一个框架(通过过滤不重要的噪音)。任何不能直接推动项目前进的东西都不值得学习(目前),因为反正你也留不住。

换句话说,当你想学新东西时,不要开始学习,而是迈出实现目标的第一步。

3) 寻求特定知识。

I ultimately think that everyone should be figuring out what it is that they uniquely do best—that aligns with who they are fundamentally, and that gives them authenticity, that brings them specific knowledge, that gives them competitive advantage, that makes them irreplaceable. And they should just lean into that. And sometimes you don’t know what that is until you do it.

我最终认为每个人都应该弄清楚他们独特地做得最好的是什么——这与他们根本上的自我相一致,赋予他们真实性,带给他们特定知识,赋予他们竞争优势,使他们不可替代。他们应该只是倾注于此。有时你不知道那是什么,直到你去做了。

– Naval

学校教授通用知识,或从事工作所需的知识。

它们不教你如何开辟自己的道路。它们将你局限在一个研究领域,这在本质上并没有让你准备好通过创业之路——或者仅仅是做你想做的事——来指导你自己的工作。

自我教育是学习实现自我生成目标所需内容的过程。再次强调,不要囤积通用知识来感觉自己在学习。

举个例子,假设我想学习 After Effects——动画软件。

去看一堆通用的 After Effects 教程并学习关于该软件的每一个小细节是愚蠢的。

相反,你需要对你想要构建的项目有一个愿景。

你用你现有的知识开始项目,如果你没有知识,那么你找一个与你想要创建的项目尽可能相似的具体教程。

现在,既然你有了过滤器(你想要创建什么),大部分教程将是无用的,但你会找到一个小技巧,让你至少可以开始项目。

你应用它,然后重复,直到你积累了如此多的技巧,当你去创建下一个项目时,然后再下一个,它会变得越来越容易。

学习吉他或乐器也是如此。

你不是去学习乐理。

选择一首你想演奏的歌。

然后你学习这首歌的第一个和弦。然后是第二个。然后是第三个。最终你学会了以特定的方式调音,你学会了一些让你演奏得更好的小窍门。

在学习了几首歌之后,你会觉得你似乎可以创作你自己的简单歌曲了。

那就是你学习的方式。

The Second Subconscious (Delete Your Note-Taking System)

I’ve tried all the systems before, and I loved them. I started with Roam Research, and it completely changed how I write. I built a knowledge base of potent ideas, and pulled from those every time I sat down to put words on a screen.

A few years ago, I even built Kortex, which wasn’t meant to be second-brain software, but that’s what it ended up being before it inevitably failed. Well, it didn’t really fail, but it painfully evolved into Eden, which has become the best tool on the market to find what’s trending on social media (for creators), and capture ideas from anywhere (for creatives).

So, I’m not here to say that second brains are useless.

I simply think they’re misused.

You bookmark and take notes just for them to never be seen again. You quite literally wasted your time thinking you were learning when you could have been actually learning, as we discussed.

In the past, people didn’t have a popularized “second brain” that markets well. They had a commonplace book.

Marcus Aurelius’ book, Meditations, is essentially a private commonplace book with notes to himself and digested philosophy. It was never meant to be published.

Leonardo da Vinci filled thousands of notebook pages with sketches, observations, questions, and borrowed ideas.

Mark Twain, H.P. Lovecraft, Thomas Jefferson, Ronald Reagan, Montaigne, Rick Rubin, and many more each had some variation of this.

But there is one major difference between the everyday second brain stan and them.

Their collection of ideas were fuel for their creations.

Their inventions, writing, and music would not be what they are today, and I would go as far as saying you wouldn’t even know who those famous people are if they didn’t have some variation of a commonplace book.

When you create something, your subconscious spits out relevant ideas that contribute to the quality of the creation, but it’s still limited in processing power, and sometimes it decides to not help you at all, leaving you in a creative rut.

A metaphor that Seneca used was to gather pollen from many flowers, then digest it into your own honey.

In modern terms, steal like an artist.

This is the antidote to writers block. You don’t have ideas for your writing, content, or videos because you don’t have a repository of ideas to pull from. Every single thing I’ve written in this letter is from articles, videos, social posts, random ideas, and highlights I’ve saved before.

I think you get it, but how do we actually build this?

How do we create a digital commonplace book, or second subconscious, that we can build throughout our lives that doesn’t turn into a cluttered note-taking app where your ideas go to die?

Step 1) Choose The Right Software, Or Create Your Own AI System

Don’t get breathless about how “smart” AI is. It’s dumber than a sack of wet hammers.

Leverage, instead, its ability to do rapid input and output for simple tasks on large datasets.

– Devon Eriksen

Most note-taking and “second brain” software still require manual upkeep.

Some of them have an AI chat tacked on, which is absolutely useful, but they’re missing the most useful application of them all: making it so your ideas don’t disappear into the void - because your creative work depends on your ability to resurface them.

You have 2 options here.

Our goal is to have somewhere to drop ideas and easily be able to resurface the right ones for our project.

  • Option 1 - Use a combination like Claude Code + Obsidian to store your knowledge in one place and retrieve ideas with AI

  • Option 2 - Use a software like MyMind or Eden, which auto-tags, categorizes, and embeds your knowledge in “meaning space” so it can connect seemingly unrelated ideas to birth novel insights

There are plenty of tutorials on the internet for option 1. It’s very popular right now because people swapped their precious collection of Notion templates for a collection of Claude skills (a fad that will fade as they all do), but here’s the 80/20 of how to do it yourself:

  1. Download Obsidian and Claude

  2. Open Claude Code or Claude Cowork and select your Obsidian vault folder on your computer as the folder you’re working in

  3. Create a “save an idea” skill - ask claude to create a skill that creates a note in an inbox folder with a clear title

  4. Create a “process my inbox” skill - ask claude to create a skill that goes through your inbox folder, add tags, move it to the right folder, and add backlinks to other related notes within the vault

  5. Ask Claude to help you define your taxonomy so it knows what tags/categories to use

That allows you to capture ideas, notes, and knowledge into a time-tested note-taking tool.

Then, you can ask Claude at anytime to “Search my vault for everything related to [idea I’m writing about].”

That works for finding most ideas, but good writing and creative work come from novel connections, not keyword search or the AI brainstorming synonyms to find related matches.

If you don’t want to do all of that manually, then you can use a software like MyMind, which allows you to save any link or idea to one big and searchable library.

Eden does the same thing (you can capture anything fast into your library), but takes it a step further. When you save a link, like a Substack article or YouTube video, it transcribes it, and allows you to highlight it. Plus, you can integrate with Kindle to pull all previous highlights in - which are potent creative fuel.

The way MyMind and Eden differ from Obsidian and Claude is that everything you add to your library is automatically tagged, categorized, and embedded. So you can do the same search that Claude allows you to do, without wasting precious AI usage (Eden also has an MCP if you do want to build and access your knowledge base with Claude.) Plus, if you’re a writer or creator, Eden has an outlier search feed where you can find what social posts are performing in your niche and save them straight to your library.

I am not entirely sure if MyMind does this, but with Eden, it also differs in that it can search based on meaning.

Obsidian can show you “what’s related,” Eden can show you “what’s nearby” because each idea is embedded with ~1500 numbers that act as GPS coordinates for an idea. They can be found even if they share zero of the same words. This is what allows you to just drop an idea in and forget about it, because you know you will find it exactly when you need it.

It can pull up novel connections without re-searching through your entire knowledge base every time, costing hundreds of thousands of AI tokens.

You probably don’t want to maintain a vector database, an embedding API, indexing scripts, re-embedding when notes change, keeping the index in sync when files are renamed or deleted, and caching so you don’t re-pay for unchanged content.

All of the tools do this for free, but if you want a true “second subconscious” that you can research while writing, creating, or building projects - Eden may be worth trying out.

Step 2) Capture The Ideas That Best Represent Your Ideal Mind

Now that you have a place to drop ideas without worrying about organization (because you only organize things if you want to find them later, which we just solved), you don’t just dump everything in their.

When AI can create anything, curation matters more than ever.

You need a curated space for ideas that spark inspiration. The opposite of an endless fire hose of noise we call a social media feed.

As a writer, creator, or someone trying to do independent work (meaning you need to build an audience by attracting them to the ideas you put out), people don’t follow you for your content anymore.

There’s Google, AI, and plenty of information that can be found at the click of a button.

They follow you for your point of view. Your opinion. Your interpretation. Your personality. Your story. And all of those things are downstream of the ideas that compose your worldview. The ideas you use to make sense of the world.

As an example, when I get into a conversation about the nature of reality, my mind jumps to ideas about history, integral theory, spiral dynamics, and more - because I’ve deemed these the most useful lens from which I can view that conversation from. It makes the most sense out of the other ideas I’ve heard that tend to fall flat.

Those are the ideas you capture.

You curate a large set of knowledge that would best represent your ideal mind.

Because that’s what your fancy note-taking system was meant to be, right?

You just never got around to solidifying those ideas as a part of yourself, usually through the act of thinking, writing, and sharing in public so that you can receive feedback from the market and let the best ideas win.

How do you do this?

You read more books. You let your curiosity guide you. You reject doomscrolling and embrace curated lists of authors and thinkers who are dedicated to producing good ideas. You make time for “research,” because as a writer or creator, that’s 80% of your job.

The rest of your job is just synthesizing that “research” into something that’s beneficial to other people.

Step 3) Build Your Ideal Mind Through The Act Of Creation

Let’s close the loop.

We have the system for capturing and retrieving knowledge.

But now we need the project to apply it too so that it doesn’t go to waste.

And, we still aren’t capturing specific knowledge because we don’t have a reason to learn. We aren’t giving our mind the frame from which it can effectively signal that ideas are important enough to capture, as we discussed.

That’s the entire goal we’re after, right?

We want to be smarter. We want to retain and remember what we learn. We want to sound articulate. For superficial reasons, maybe, but also because the outcome of our lives depend on the decisions that we make, and our level of smartness and ability to articulate our own value absolutely contribute positively to that.

I can’t tell you what to create.

But if you’re interested in writing, I can give you a part of my process that recently helped someone else.

For something like writing a Substack article, YouTube script, or X article, here’s what I would do:

1) Choose a topic.

Obviously.

The best topics are the ones that lie at the intersection of performance and excitement.

Performance = topics that have already proven to do well.

You find these by saving social posts that have gone viral, or using a research tool that allows you to find outlier content and study creator’s top posts.

(This article I’m writing now is based on “How to remember everything you read,” a topic that has gone viral more times than I can count, but I applied my own contrarian perspective to it).

Excitement = topics and ideas that you want to explore more out of curiosity.

Your job is to pair the topic you want to write about (that probably wouldn’t do well on social media) with a topic that has already proven do well, so that you can write about what you want and increase it’s potential to actually gain traction.

That’s where most beginners fail.

2) Braindump → Outline → Draft

Don’t start writing yet.

Writer’s don’t just open one page and then expect all of the ideas to linearly fall into place.

Start with a braindump. Write down all potential ideas that could fit under the topic you’re writing. Look through your notes, ideas, and links and add them inside it too.

Then, start to add some structure with an outline. Take all the ideas in your braindump and try to fit them into a general storytelling framework: Problem → Insight → Solution.

Organize ideas under each of those sections in the outline.

Then, have your outline, ideas, and library of knowledge open and ready to pull from as you string together the ideas in the form of an actual draft.

3) Use AI to remove friction, not write for you.

I’ll write about my thoughts on AI writing in a future letter, but when I say “don’t use AI for writing,” I’m actually saying “don’t use AI to articulate your own beliefs and opinions.”

Now that Substack has their AI writing estimator, people are going to start pointing out how certain accounts use AI in their writing. I’ve had a few point out that some of my articles have AI writing in them.

Don’t be dense.

Yes, I copy paste straight from AI when providing pure information - like explanations of Greuter’s 9 stages of ego development, the same information you’d get from a Google search. I’m not going to waste my breath trying to rewrite it in my own words, because that doesn’t need to happen. It’s a disservice to myself and the reader.

I think there is value in struggling to articulate your own thoughts and beliefs, which is something the anti-AI people can’t seem to do very well as they are kept narrow minded by their new religion.

When I say “use AI to remove friction,” I am talking about using it like you would a course or mentor or editor while you are learning the skill.

If you don’t know how to structure your article, ask for a list of structures that your ideas could fit into.

If you don’t know what to write next, ask for a few directions the article can go.

If you don’t understand something, research it, like any writer would in the past with a less efficient method of scouring through the internet for the right information.

All in all, I trust that you have a brain.

You are ultimately the one who decides what gets published.

If it doesn’t represent the values, ideas, and beliefs you want it to, then refine it until it does.

I’ll leave it at that, because I have much more to say that I’ll save for another letter.

– Dan

If you want to write but don’t know where to start, what to write about, or anything about how to grow on social media, consider joining the bootcamp here.

第二潜意识(删除你的记笔记系统)

我以前尝试过所有的系统,而且我很喜欢它们。我从 Roam Research 开始,它彻底改变了我的写作方式。我建立了一个包含有力想法的知识库,每次我坐下来在屏幕上写字时都会从中提取。

几年前,我甚至构建了 Kortex,它本意不是做第二大脑软件,但在它不可避免地失败之前,它最终变成了那样。嗯,它并没有真正失败,但它痛苦地演变成了 Eden,后者已成为市场上寻找社交媒体趋势(针对创作者)和从任何地方捕捉想法(针对创意人员)的最佳工具。

所以,我不是来说第二大脑无用的。

我只是认为它们被误用了

你收藏书签和记笔记,结果它们再也没被看过。你确实浪费了时间,以为自己在学习,而其实你本可以真正地学习,正如我们讨论的那样。

在过去,人们没有一个营销良好的流行“第二大脑”。他们有一本摘录本

Marcus Aurelius 的书《沉思录》本质上是一本私人摘录本,里面有给自己的笔记和消化的哲学。它本无意出版。

Leonardo da Vinci 填满了数千页的笔记本,里面有素描、观察、问题和借用的想法。

Mark Twain、H.P. Lovecraft、Thomas Jefferson、Ronald Reagan、Montaigne、Rick Rubin 以及更多人都各有某种变体。

但是,普通的第二大脑狂热者与他们之间有一个主要区别。

他们收集的想法是他们创作的燃料

他们的发明、写作和音乐不会是今天这个样子,我甚至敢说,如果他们没有某种形式的摘录本,你甚至都不会知道那些名人是谁。

当你创造某样东西时,你的潜意识会吐出相关的想法,这些想法有助于创作的质量,但它的处理能力仍然有限,有时它决定根本不帮你,让你陷入创作瓶颈。

Seneca 使用的一个比喻是从许多花朵中采集花粉,然后将其消化成你自己的蜂蜜。

用现代的话说,像艺术家一样偷窃。

这是写作瓶颈的解药。你没有写作、内容或视频的想法,是因为你没有一个可以提取的想法库。我在这封信中写的每一件事都来自文章、视频、社交帖子、随机想法和我之前保存的高亮。

我想你明白了,但我们究竟如何构建它?

我们如何创建一个数字摘录本,或第二潜意识,让我们可以在一生中构建它,而不会变成一个杂乱无章的记笔记应用程序,让你的想法在那里消亡?

步骤 1) 选择正确的软件,或创建你自己的 AI 系统

Don’t get breathless about how “smart” AI is. It’s dumber than a sack of wet hammers.

不要对 AI 有多“聪明”感到气喘吁吁。它比一袋湿锤子还笨。

Leverage, instead, its ability to do rapid input and output for simple tasks on large datasets.

相反,利用它在大型数据集上快速执行简单任务的输入和输出能力。

– Devon Eriksen

大多数记笔记和“第二大脑”软件仍然需要手动维护。

有些软件附加了 AI 聊天功能,这绝对有用,但它们错过了所有应用中最有用的一个:确保你的想法不会消失在虚空中——因为你的创意工作取决于你重新浮现它们的能力。

你这里有两个选择。

我们的目标是有一个可以投放想法的地方,并能轻松地为我们的项目重新浮现正确的想法。

  • 选项 1 - 使用像 Claude Code + Obsidian 这样的组合,将你的知识存储在一个地方,并使用 AI 检索想法

  • 选项 2 - 使用像 MyMind 或 Eden 这样的软件,它们会自动标记、分类并将你的知识嵌入“意义空间”,以便它能连接看似无关的想法,从而产生新颖的见解

互联网上有很多关于选项 1 的教程。它现在非常流行,因为人们把他们珍贵的 Notion 模板集合换成了 Claude 技能集合(一种会像所有潮流一样消退的时尚),但这里是如何自己动手做的 80/20 法则:

  1. 下载 Obsidian 和 Claude

  2. 打开 Claude Code 或 Claude Cowork,并选择你电脑上的 Obsidian 库文件夹作为你正在工作的文件夹

  3. 创建一个“保存想法”技能——让 claude 创建一个技能,在收件箱文件夹中创建一个带有清晰标题的笔记

  4. 创建一个“处理我的收件箱”技能——让 claude 创建一个技能,遍历你的收件箱文件夹,添加标签,将其移动到正确的文件夹,并在库中添加指向其他相关笔记的反向链接

  5. 让 Claude 帮你定义你的分类法,以便它知道使用什么标签/类别

这允许你将想法、笔记和知识捕获到一个久经考验的记笔记工具中。

然后,你可以随时让 Claude“搜索我的库中与[我正在写的想法]相关的所有内容。”

这对寻找大多数想法有效,但好的写作和创意工作来自新颖的连接,而不是关键词搜索或 AI 头脑风暴同义词来查找相关匹配。

如果你不想手动做所有这些,你可以使用像 MyMind 这样的软件,它允许你将任何链接或想法保存到一个大的可搜索图书馆中。

Eden 做同样的事情(你可以快速将任何东西捕获到你的图书馆中),但更进一步。当你保存一个链接,比如 Substack 文章或 YouTube 视频时,它会转录它,并允许你高亮显示它。此外,你可以与 Kindle 集成,拉取所有以前的高亮——这些是强有力的创意燃料。

MyMind 和 Eden 与 Obsidian 和 Claude 的不同之处在于,你添加到图书馆的所有内容都会自动标记、分类和嵌入。所以你可以做 Claude 允许你做的同样的搜索,而不会浪费宝贵的 AI 使用量(如果你确实想用 Claude 构建和访问你的知识库,Eden 也有 MCP)。此外,如果你是作家或创作者,Eden 有一个离群值搜索流,你可以在其中找到你的利基市场中表现良好的社交帖子,并将它们直接保存到你的图书馆。

我不完全确定 MyMind 是否这样做,但对于 Eden,它的不同之处还在于它可以基于含义进行搜索。

Obsidian 可以向你展示“什么是相关的”,Eden 可以向你展示“什么是附近的”,因为每个想法都嵌入了约 1500 个数字,充当想法的 GPS 坐标。即使它们共享零个相同的词,也能找到它们。这就是允许你只需将想法投入其中并忘记它的原因,因为你知道你会在需要时准确找到它。

它可以提取新颖的连接,而无需每次都重新搜索你的整个知识库,从而节省数十万个 AI Token。

你可能不想维护向量数据库、嵌入 API、索引脚本、在笔记更改时重新嵌入、在文件重命名或删除时保持索引同步,以及缓存以免为未更改的内容重新付费。

所有工具都免费这样做,但如果你想要一个真正的“第二潜意识”,可以在写作、创作或构建项目时进行研究——Eden 可能值得一试。

步骤 2) 捕捉最能代表你理想思维的想法

既然你有一个可以投放想法而不用担心组织的地方(因为我们刚刚解决了组织问题,你只有在想以后找到它们时才组织),你不要只是把所有东西都扔进去。

当 AI 可以创造任何东西时,策展比以往任何时候都重要。

你需要一个精心策划的空间,存放那些激发灵感的想法。这与我们称之为社交媒体流的无尽噪音消防水管相反。

作为一名作家、创作者或试图做独立工作的人(意味着你需要通过吸引人们关注你发布的想法来建立受众),人们不再为你的内容关注你。

有 Google、AI 和大量只需点击按钮就能找到的信息。

他们关注你是为了你的观点。你的看法。你的解读。你的个性。你的故事。所有这些都源于构成你世界观的那些想法。你用来理解世界的那些想法。

举个例子,当我参与关于现实本质的对话时,我的思维会跳转到关于历史、整体理论、螺旋动力学等的想法——因为我已经认定这些是我可以用来看待该对话的最有用的透镜。它在我听到的其他往往站不住脚的想法中最有意义。

那些就是你要捕捉的想法。

你策划一套最能代表你理想思维的大型知识集。

因为那就是你花哨的记笔记系统本该成为的样子,对吧?

你只是从来没有通过思考、写作和公开分享来将这些想法巩固为你自己的一部分,这样你就可以从市场获得反馈,让最好的想法胜出。

你怎么做?

你读更多的书。你让你的好奇心引导你。你拒绝末日刷屏,拥抱致力于产生好想法的作者和思想家的精选列表。你为“研究”腾出时间,因为作为作家或创作者,那是你工作的 80%。

你工作的其余部分只是将那些“研究”综合成对他人有益的东西。

步骤 3) 通过创造行为构建你的理想思维

让我们闭环。

我们有了捕捉和检索知识的系统。

但现在我们需要项目来应用它,以免浪费。

而且,我们仍然没有捕捉特定知识,因为我们没有理由去学习。我们没有给我们的头脑提供框架,让它能有效地发出信号表明想法足够重要值得捕捉,正如我们讨论的那样。

这就是我们追求的最终目标,对吧?

我们想变得更聪明。我们想保留并记住我们学到的东西。我们想听起来口齿伶俐。也许是因为肤浅的原因,但也因为我们生活的结果取决于我们做出的决定,而我们的聪明程度和表达我们自身价值的能力绝对对此有积极贡献。

我不能告诉你去创造什么。

但如果你对写作感兴趣,我可以给你一部分我的流程,这最近帮助了其他人。

对于像写 Substack 文章、YouTube 脚本或 X 文章这样的事情,我会这样做:

1) 选择一个话题。

显然。

最好的话题是位于表现和兴奋交集处的那些。

表现 = 已经被证明表现良好的话题。

你通过保存已经爆火的社交帖子,或使用研究工具找到离群内容并研究创作者的顶级帖子来找到这些。

(我现在写的这篇文章是基于“如何记住你读过的所有内容”,这个话题爆火的次数我都数不清了,但我对其应用了我自己的逆向视角)。

兴奋 = 你出于好奇想更多探索的话题和想法。

你的工作是将你想写的话题(可能在社交媒体上表现不佳)与一个已经被证明表现良好的话题配对,这样你可以写你想写的,并增加它实际获得关注的潜力。

这就是大多数初学者失败的地方。

2) 脑力倾倒 → 大纲 → 草稿

还没开始写。

作家不会只是打开一个页面,然后期望所有的想法线性地各就各位。

从脑力倾倒开始。写下所有可能适合你正在写的话题的潜在想法。翻阅你的笔记、想法和链接,并将它们添加到里面。

然后,开始用大纲添加一些结构。拿出脑力倾倒中的所有想法,并尝试将它们放入一个通用的讲故事框架中:问题 → 见解 → 解决方案。

在大纲中的每个部分下组织想法。

然后,打开你的大纲、想法和知识库,准备在将想法串联成实际草稿的形式时从中提取。

3) 使用 AI 来消除摩擦,而不是替你写作。

我会在未来的信中写下我对 AI 写作的看法,但当我说“不要使用 AI 写作”时,我实际上是在说“不要使用 AI 来表达你自己的信念和观点”。

既然 Substack 有了他们的 AI 写作评估器,人们将开始指出某些账户如何在他们的写作中使用 AI。我有几次被指出我的一些文章中有 AI 写作。

别那么迟钝。

是的,在提供纯粹信息时,我会直接从 AI 复制粘贴——比如对 Greuter 的自我发展 9 个阶段的解释,这些信息你会从 Google 搜索中得到。我不会浪费口舌试图用我自己的话重写它,因为那不需要发生。这对我和读者都是一种伤害。

我认为在努力表达你自己的想法和信念方面是有价值的,这是反 AI 人士似乎做不到很好的事情,因为他们被他们的新宗教束缚了思想。

当我说“使用 AI 消除摩擦”时,我是说像你在学习技能时使用课程、导师或编辑那样使用它。

如果你不知道如何构建你的文章,询问一系列你的想法可以融入的结构列表。

如果你不知道接下来写什么,询问文章可以去的几个方向。

如果你不理解某些东西,研究它,就像过去任何作家用效率较低的方法在互联网上搜寻正确信息那样。

总而言之,我相信你有大脑。

最终决定发布什么的人是你。

如果它不代表你想要的价值观、想法和信念,那就完善它,直到它代表为止。

我就说到这里,因为我还有更多话要说,我会留到另一封信里。

– Dan

如果你想写作但不知道从哪里开始,写什么,或关于如何在社交媒体上发展的任何事,请考虑加入这里的训练营。

If you need to remember it, it’s not important. If it’s important, you will remember it.

For some reason, it’s become an obsession to remember everything you read. There are hundreds of videos about it with millions of views.

People feel like if they don’t retain the knowledge from what they read, they're a failure, or they wasted your time, when that’s not the point of reading at all.

Why would you want to memorize every word of a book in the first place?

I know why.

You want to sound smart.

It’s an unconscious status symbol for you.

You want to impress others with your articulation and intelligence, but you don’t realize that sounding smart comes from understanding, not memorization, and understanding requires a much different approach to learning. It also doesn’t help that schools tested you on your ability to memorize. You studied for hours just so you could pencil in the right answer. That’s not how life works.

I get it.

You want to acquire knowledge so that you can make better decisions and work yourself into a more advantageous life situation with more money and power so you don't have to worry about your day-to-day survival. Everyone wants that, but memorizing facts is the least effective way to get there.

That’s what we’ll talk about first - how to acquire knowledge in a way that actually sticks, so you can create a better future for yourself.

Then, we’ll talk about why your note-taking system, bookmarks, and even your precious “second brain” (the sex doll for mental masturbators) are largely useless.

Skip to the rest of the article if you're allergic to self-promotion:

Speaking of second brain, we just added Library, Reader, and Highlights to Eden. Now, not only can you research creators’ top content and find your next viral topic (and schedule posts to be published), but you can build an interconnected library of posts, links, and ideas that Eden organizes for you - and allows you to search based on meaning rather than just keywords.

And, you can save any Substack article, X article, or YouTube video, read the transcript, and highlight so you never lose an idea.

We haven't fully started blasting Eden in public yet, but our users have been vocal about how much of a game-changer it is for creatives and creators.

Get 4 months and the Creator Bootcamp free (normally $499) here.

How to actually learn anything fast

https://eden.so/

Most people have no idea how to learn.

Because most people have no idea what the learning process is.

The reason most learning fails is that there is no negative feedback loop.

Think of it like this.

If you don’t have the goal of getting in shape (and I’m talking a deep intrinsically generated goal not a superficial goal you’re pursuing to fit in, like a new years resolution) then a night of heavy drinking and partying won’t register as a problem (negative feedback), because it doesn’t impact your non-existent goal of performing on your morning run or gym session the next day. You can go to work just fine with a hangover because you don’t give a shit about how well you do at your job.

Learning is a cybernetic process.

Cybernetics sounds like something relating to cyborgs, but it stems from the Greek word kybernētēs, meaning steersman or helmsman. The person who steers the ship.

The word “cybernetics” was chosen because the helmsman is the perfect image of a feedback system. The helmsman doesn’t just point the ship in a direction once, he constantly reads the current state (wind, waves, heading), compares it against the intended course, and adjusts. In other words, the process of trial and error, and so few people have the direction that allows them to notice errors in their life.

Cybernetics illustrates the properties of intelligent systems.

https://eden.so/?utm_source=thedankoe&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=social_evergreen&utm_content=x_article

  1. Reference signal (the goal) – The system holds a target state.

  2. Sensor (perception) – The system reads its current state.

  3. Comparator (the gap) – The system computes the difference between target and current state. The difference is the error signal.

  4. Actuator (behavior) – The system acts to reduce the error.

Like how a thermostat turns on the heat when it gets too cold, or how your pancreas releases insulin when blood sugar rises.

That exposes the issue nicely.

When most people try to learn something new, they focus on content. They hoard material and try to absorb it with spaced repetition, flashcards, courses, and learning the fundamentals. They assume learning is an input process.

In reality, learning is an output process, because output demands input.

A goal creates the error signal.

The error signal creates the filter.

The filter creates relevance (most people fill their mind with noise and things they will never use).

The relevance creates retention.

A person who has been conditioned their entire life to have the nearly unconscious goal of going to school and getting a job will naturally learn and behave in that direction. The destiny they were assigned will inevitably come true.

The person who is deeply conditioned to go down the default path will not even notice money-making opportunities outside of a job, because their brain is filtering it out. The big life goals they were assigned at birth dictate their behavior and learning. They are a puppet of someone else’s ideals. They are not in control of their life.

But if you consciously create your own frame, by knowing exactly what you don’t want out of life and comparing it to an evolving vision of what you do want out of life, you are only then able to sense when you are off track, notice the error, correct the direction you are heading, and learn as a byproduct.

Makes sense, but what do you actually do?

Step 1) Become obsessed with a meaningful goal.

The way you become obsessed is to look at your current actions and realize where your life will end up if you don’t change.

For most people, that outcome is not pretty.

Sit with that image, let it fill you with potent emotion, and redirect that emotional energy toward a better direction for your life.

Only then can you actually align the goals you pursue with the aim of your future. Only then does a useful learning process start, the opposite of schooling, where your learning is determined by the direction and goals society sets for you.

Being extreme changes your brain and enhances neuroplasticity. In my eyes, you’re better off making an extreme change than making a lot of small changes.

Burn the boats. Change your life.

2) Don’t start learning.

The life you want lies at the end of a series of meaningful projects.

Your mind is to be treated as a project. As is your body, relationships, and financial situation. A project is simply a structured set of goals and milestones. A project creates a frame for your learning (by filtering unimportant noise). Anything that does not directly move the project forward is not worth learning (right now), because you won’t retain it anyway.

In other words, when you want to learn something new, don’t start learning, take the first step toward the goal instead.

3) Seek specific knowledge.

I ultimately think that everyone should be figuring out what it is that they uniquely do best—that aligns with who they are fundamentally, and that gives them authenticity, that brings them specific knowledge, that gives them competitive advantage, that makes them irreplaceable. And they should just lean into that. And sometimes you don’t know what that is until you do it.

– Naval

Schools teach general knowledge, or knowledge required to do a job.

They do not teach how to navigate your own path. They narrow you into one area of study, which by nature does not prepare you to direct your own work through the path of entrepreneurship - or simply doing what you want to do.

Self-education is the process of learning what’s necessary to achieve self-generated goals. Again, no hoarding general knowledge to feel like you’re learning.

As an example, let’s say I want to learn After Effects - the animation software.

It would be stupid to go and watch a bunch of general After Effects tutorials and learn every little thing about the software.

Instead, you need a vision for the project you want to build.

You start the project with the knowledge you have, and if you don’t have knowledge, then you find a specific tutorial that is as similar to the project you want to create as it can be.

Now, since you have a filter (what you want to create), most of the tutorial will be useless, but you will find one little technique that allows you to at least start the project.

You apply that and then repeat until you’ve stacked so many techniques that when you go to create your next project, then the next, it becomes easier and easier.

Same with learning the guitar or an instrument.

You don’t go and study music theory.

You choose a song you want to play.

Then you learn the first chord of the song. Then the second. Then the third. And eventually you learn to tune it a specific way, and you pick up little hacks that allow you to play better.

After learning a few songs, you feel as if you could then create your own simple song.

That is how you learn.

The Second Subconscious (Delete Your Note-Taking System)

I’ve tried all the systems before, and I loved them. I started with Roam Research, and it completely changed how I write. I built a knowledge base of potent ideas, and pulled from those every time I sat down to put words on a screen.

A few years ago, I even built Kortex, which wasn’t meant to be second-brain software, but that’s what it ended up being before it inevitably failed. Well, it didn’t really fail, but it painfully evolved into Eden, which has become the best tool on the market to find what’s trending on social media (for creators), and capture ideas from anywhere (for creatives).

So, I’m not here to say that second brains are useless.

I simply think they’re misused.

You bookmark and take notes just for them to never be seen again. You quite literally wasted your time thinking you were learning when you could have been actually learning, as we discussed.

In the past, people didn’t have a popularized “second brain” that markets well. They had a commonplace book.

Marcus Aurelius’ book, Meditations, is essentially a private commonplace book with notes to himself and digested philosophy. It was never meant to be published.

Leonardo da Vinci filled thousands of notebook pages with sketches, observations, questions, and borrowed ideas.

Mark Twain, H.P. Lovecraft, Thomas Jefferson, Ronald Reagan, Montaigne, Rick Rubin, and many more each had some variation of this.

But there is one major difference between the everyday second brain stan and them.

Their collection of ideas were fuel for their creations.

Their inventions, writing, and music would not be what they are today, and I would go as far as saying you wouldn’t even know who those famous people are if they didn’t have some variation of a commonplace book.

When you create something, your subconscious spits out relevant ideas that contribute to the quality of the creation, but it’s still limited in processing power, and sometimes it decides to not help you at all, leaving you in a creative rut.

A metaphor that Seneca used was to gather pollen from many flowers, then digest it into your own honey.

In modern terms, steal like an artist.

This is the antidote to writers block. You don’t have ideas for your writing, content, or videos because you don’t have a repository of ideas to pull from. Every single thing I’ve written in this letter is from articles, videos, social posts, random ideas, and highlights I’ve saved before.

I think you get it, but how do we actually build this?

How do we create a digital commonplace book, or second subconscious, that we can build throughout our lives that doesn’t turn into a cluttered note-taking app where your ideas go to die?

Step 1) Choose The Right Software, Or Create Your Own AI System

Don’t get breathless about how “smart” AI is. It’s dumber than a sack of wet hammers.

Leverage, instead, its ability to do rapid input and output for simple tasks on large datasets.

– Devon Eriksen

Most note-taking and “second brain” software still require manual upkeep.

Some of them have an AI chat tacked on, which is absolutely useful, but they’re missing the most useful application of them all: making it so your ideas don’t disappear into the void - because your creative work depends on your ability to resurface them.

You have 2 options here.

Our goal is to have somewhere to drop ideas and easily be able to resurface the right ones for our project.

  • Option 1 - Use a combination like Claude Code + Obsidian to store your knowledge in one place and retrieve ideas with AI

  • Option 2 - Use a software like MyMind or Eden, which auto-tags, categorizes, and embeds your knowledge in “meaning space” so it can connect seemingly unrelated ideas to birth novel insights

There are plenty of tutorials on the internet for option 1. It’s very popular right now because people swapped their precious collection of Notion templates for a collection of Claude skills (a fad that will fade as they all do), but here’s the 80/20 of how to do it yourself:

  1. Download Obsidian and Claude

  2. Open Claude Code or Claude Cowork and select your Obsidian vault folder on your computer as the folder you’re working in

  3. Create a “save an idea” skill - ask claude to create a skill that creates a note in an inbox folder with a clear title

  4. Create a “process my inbox” skill - ask claude to create a skill that goes through your inbox folder, add tags, move it to the right folder, and add backlinks to other related notes within the vault

  5. Ask Claude to help you define your taxonomy so it knows what tags/categories to use

That allows you to capture ideas, notes, and knowledge into a time-tested note-taking tool.

Then, you can ask Claude at anytime to “Search my vault for everything related to [idea I’m writing about].”

That works for finding most ideas, but good writing and creative work come from novel connections, not keyword search or the AI brainstorming synonyms to find related matches.

If you don’t want to do all of that manually, then you can use a software like MyMind, which allows you to save any link or idea to one big and searchable library.

Eden does the same thing (you can capture anything fast into your library), but takes it a step further. When you save a link, like a Substack article or YouTube video, it transcribes it, and allows you to highlight it. Plus, you can integrate with Kindle to pull all previous highlights in - which are potent creative fuel.

The way MyMind and Eden differ from Obsidian and Claude is that everything you add to your library is automatically tagged, categorized, and embedded. So you can do the same search that Claude allows you to do, without wasting precious AI usage (Eden also has an MCP if you do want to build and access your knowledge base with Claude.) Plus, if you’re a writer or creator, Eden has an outlier search feed where you can find what social posts are performing in your niche and save them straight to your library.

I am not entirely sure if MyMind does this, but with Eden, it also differs in that it can search based on meaning.

Obsidian can show you “what’s related,” Eden can show you “what’s nearby” because each idea is embedded with ~1500 numbers that act as GPS coordinates for an idea. They can be found even if they share zero of the same words. This is what allows you to just drop an idea in and forget about it, because you know you will find it exactly when you need it.

It can pull up novel connections without re-searching through your entire knowledge base every time, costing hundreds of thousands of AI tokens.

You probably don’t want to maintain a vector database, an embedding API, indexing scripts, re-embedding when notes change, keeping the index in sync when files are renamed or deleted, and caching so you don’t re-pay for unchanged content.

All of the tools do this for free, but if you want a true “second subconscious” that you can research while writing, creating, or building projects - Eden may be worth trying out.

Step 2) Capture The Ideas That Best Represent Your Ideal Mind

Now that you have a place to drop ideas without worrying about organization (because you only organize things if you want to find them later, which we just solved), you don’t just dump everything in their.

When AI can create anything, curation matters more than ever.

You need a curated space for ideas that spark inspiration. The opposite of an endless fire hose of noise we call a social media feed.

As a writer, creator, or someone trying to do independent work (meaning you need to build an audience by attracting them to the ideas you put out), people don’t follow you for your content anymore.

There’s Google, AI, and plenty of information that can be found at the click of a button.

They follow you for your point of view. Your opinion. Your interpretation. Your personality. Your story. And all of those things are downstream of the ideas that compose your worldview. The ideas you use to make sense of the world.

As an example, when I get into a conversation about the nature of reality, my mind jumps to ideas about history, integral theory, spiral dynamics, and more - because I’ve deemed these the most useful lens from which I can view that conversation from. It makes the most sense out of the other ideas I’ve heard that tend to fall flat.

Those are the ideas you capture.

You curate a large set of knowledge that would best represent your ideal mind.

Because that’s what your fancy note-taking system was meant to be, right?

You just never got around to solidifying those ideas as a part of yourself, usually through the act of thinking, writing, and sharing in public so that you can receive feedback from the market and let the best ideas win.

How do you do this?

You read more books. You let your curiosity guide you. You reject doomscrolling and embrace curated lists of authors and thinkers who are dedicated to producing good ideas. You make time for “research,” because as a writer or creator, that’s 80% of your job.

The rest of your job is just synthesizing that “research” into something that’s beneficial to other people.

Step 3) Build Your Ideal Mind Through The Act Of Creation

Let’s close the loop.

We have the system for capturing and retrieving knowledge.

But now we need the project to apply it too so that it doesn’t go to waste.

And, we still aren’t capturing specific knowledge because we don’t have a reason to learn. We aren’t giving our mind the frame from which it can effectively signal that ideas are important enough to capture, as we discussed.

That’s the entire goal we’re after, right?

We want to be smarter. We want to retain and remember what we learn. We want to sound articulate. For superficial reasons, maybe, but also because the outcome of our lives depend on the decisions that we make, and our level of smartness and ability to articulate our own value absolutely contribute positively to that.

I can’t tell you what to create.

But if you’re interested in writing, I can give you a part of my process that recently helped someone else.

For something like writing a Substack article, YouTube script, or X article, here’s what I would do:

1) Choose a topic.

Obviously.

The best topics are the ones that lie at the intersection of performance and excitement.

Performance = topics that have already proven to do well.

You find these by saving social posts that have gone viral, or using a research tool that allows you to find outlier content and study creator’s top posts.

(This article I’m writing now is based on “How to remember everything you read,” a topic that has gone viral more times than I can count, but I applied my own contrarian perspective to it).

Excitement = topics and ideas that you want to explore more out of curiosity.

Your job is to pair the topic you want to write about (that probably wouldn’t do well on social media) with a topic that has already proven do well, so that you can write about what you want and increase it’s potential to actually gain traction.

That’s where most beginners fail.

2) Braindump → Outline → Draft

Don’t start writing yet.

Writer’s don’t just open one page and then expect all of the ideas to linearly fall into place.

Start with a braindump. Write down all potential ideas that could fit under the topic you’re writing. Look through your notes, ideas, and links and add them inside it too.

Then, start to add some structure with an outline. Take all the ideas in your braindump and try to fit them into a general storytelling framework: Problem → Insight → Solution.

Organize ideas under each of those sections in the outline.

Then, have your outline, ideas, and library of knowledge open and ready to pull from as you string together the ideas in the form of an actual draft.

3) Use AI to remove friction, not write for you.

I’ll write about my thoughts on AI writing in a future letter, but when I say “don’t use AI for writing,” I’m actually saying “don’t use AI to articulate your own beliefs and opinions.”

Now that Substack has their AI writing estimator, people are going to start pointing out how certain accounts use AI in their writing. I’ve had a few point out that some of my articles have AI writing in them.

Don’t be dense.

Yes, I copy paste straight from AI when providing pure information - like explanations of Greuter’s 9 stages of ego development, the same information you’d get from a Google search. I’m not going to waste my breath trying to rewrite it in my own words, because that doesn’t need to happen. It’s a disservice to myself and the reader.

I think there is value in struggling to articulate your own thoughts and beliefs, which is something the anti-AI people can’t seem to do very well as they are kept narrow minded by their new religion.

When I say “use AI to remove friction,” I am talking about using it like you would a course or mentor or editor while you are learning the skill.

If you don’t know how to structure your article, ask for a list of structures that your ideas could fit into.

If you don’t know what to write next, ask for a few directions the article can go.

If you don’t understand something, research it, like any writer would in the past with a less efficient method of scouring through the internet for the right information.

All in all, I trust that you have a brain.

You are ultimately the one who decides what gets published.

If it doesn’t represent the values, ideas, and beliefs you want it to, then refine it until it does.

I’ll leave it at that, because I have much more to say that I’ll save for another letter.

– Dan

If you want to write but don’t know where to start, what to write about, or anything about how to grow on social media, consider joining the bootcamp here.

📋 讨论归档

讨论进行中…