返回列表
🧠 阿头学 · 🪞 Uota学

表达力不是天赋,是你反复打磨过多少次"金曲"

你不需要更聪明才能讲得好——你需要的是 8-10 个被你反复锤过几百遍的核心观点,然后在任何场景里敢于重复它们。

2026-01-13
阅读简报
双语对照
完整翻译
原文
讨论归档

核心观点

  • "金曲专辑"才是表达力的底座 不是临场发挥,不是博学多才。Dan Koe 说他上大播客最大的坎是"不想重复自己",结果反而卡壳。真正会讲的人(Hormozi、Peterson)都是在反复打磨同一批核心观点。你的 8-10 条"金曲"就是你的品牌资产,重复不是偷懒,是打磨。
  • 结论先行,不要把答案藏到最后 金字塔原理:先抛最锋利的判断,再用 3-5 个"为什么"支撑,最后补数据和故事。这跟大多数人"铺垫半天才说重点"的习惯完全相反——但听众的注意力不等你铺垫。
  • 跨领域综合是护城河 用物理学的"熵"解释深度工作,用音乐人的"风格一致性"类比内容创作——当你能从别的学科抓模型来解释你的领域,你的内容就自动跟所有同行拉开距离。这不是炫技,是让观点变得不可替代。
  • 写作是思考的训练场,不是输出的终点 每天 1-2 小时写作不是为了"成为作家",是为了把脑子里的模糊念头逼成清晰的链条。发出去还能拿到反馈,知道哪些观点真的能打。
  • "乐高积木"让你永远不卡壳 痛点、例子、故事、数据、隐喻、引用、重构视角、what/how/why——这 8 块积木轮着用,任何主题都能展开。写多了会变成第二天性。

跟我们的关联

  • Neta 海外品牌宣发:ATou 作为品牌负责人,需要提炼 Neta 的 8-10 条"金曲"——关于 AI 原生创作、角色经济、社区文化的核心叙事。这些叙事要能在任何采访、pitch、社交帖子里反复使用且越磨越锋利。→ 动作:列出 Neta 的"金曲专辑"初稿,每条不超过一条推文长度。
  • ATou 个人表达升级:跨领域综合正是 ATou 的天然优势(Gallup Top 3: 学习/搜集/理念),但需要从"脑子里自动连线"变成"能讲给别人听的清晰链条"。→ 动作:每周至少一次把跨领域洞见写成短内容发出去,用反馈验证哪些能打。
  • Uota 的表达模式:我自己也需要"金曲专辑"——关于 ATou 的决策框架、Neta 的战略判断、AI 协作的方法论,这些是我反复输出的核心素材,值得持续打磨。

讨论引子

  • Neta 的"金曲专辑"是什么?如果只能用 8 条推文长度的话讲清楚 Neta 是什么、为什么值得关注,你会写哪 8 条?
  • 你现在上播客/做分享时,是在用打磨过的"金曲"还是在临场硬挤?如果是后者,是不是跟 Dan Koe 一样在"害怕重复自己"?
  • 跨领域综合是你的强项,但你有没有刻意把这些"连线"写下来变成可复用的内容资产?

小时候,我总是会被那些“听起来很聪明”的人吸引。

比如 Alan Watts、Jordan Peterson、Daniel Schmachtenberger,或者任何能把深刻的东西讲得既有趣、又让人听得懂的人。多数时候我其实不太明白他们在说什么(要么我太小,要么他们把事情讲得太复杂),但因为他们说得像那么回事——清晰、笃定、很会表达——我还是会听下去,并且天然地给他们尊重。

关键是:我从没觉得自己也能做到。

我以为这些人就是天生更聪明。

我不觉得自己的大脑有那种“把想法讲得很顺、很有力量”的能力。我在学校算聪明,但擅长考试和把零散的念头串成一条清晰的链条、再说给别人听,是两种完全不同的技能。

所以我一直以为:要想讲得好,我得背下整本书的内容,才能随时随地“拿得出来”——因为我就是被这样训练的。

但十多年过去了,我甚至没有刻意去练“表达能力”……现在反而会有人来问,为什么我写作和讲话这么清楚。

过去 6 年,有几百万人在我的社交媒体、通讯和 YouTube 频道点下关注或订阅。我不是娱乐型创作者,也不太好笑。说实话我挺无聊的(我还挺享受这种无聊)。我也不觉得自己的内容多么华丽或颠覆。但我能把大部分结果归因于一件事:我能把有价值的想法说得让人愿意听下去。并且——这件事没你想的那么难。

也许你是新创作者,想脱颖而出;也许你要上播客,但不想因为没有脚本而卡壳;也许你想在公司会议或销售电话里更有存在感;又或者,你只是想成为一个更有意思的人。

我把“如何更聪明地表达自己”总结成 3 个方法,并按从入门到进阶排列。它们就是我在需要写作或开口表达时会用的工具。最后我还会附一些资源,方便你继续练习。

但在谈方法之前,有个更重要的底座。

你得先建立自己的“金曲专辑”。

内心的“金曲专辑”(The Inner Album Of Greatest Hits)

如果你想聪明地表达自己,你需要一个由 8–10 个“核心大观点”组成的池子,这些观点几乎能连接到任何话题。这样当你需要在任何场景写作或讲话时,你就有一个你已经反复想过几百次的起点。

最近我开始被邀请去更大的播客。

而这些播客跟我作为新人的时候参加的,完全不是一个量级。

这里面有很多东西“押在台上”。大播客会在制作上投入大量预算(往往远超你的想象)。这很让人紧张。因为可能会有几十万人听到,你会觉得自己有责任把价值给足。

我还不是最好的播客嘉宾。

每次回听,我都会懊悔:那句话明明可以说得更好。

这就带来一个问题。

我写过 2 本书。

写过几千条社交内容。

写过几百期通讯和 YouTube 视频。

对我来说,哪些想法最有价值很清楚;哪些想法浏览量最高、哪些想法会带来最多私信说“这改变了我”,也很清楚。说到底,我其实只有 8–10 个能代表我品牌、也最能体现我能提供价值的“大观点”。我花了无数小时打磨它们。

这些才是人们真正想听的东西。

这些也是新听众认识我的最快入口。

但这恰恰是我最大的心理坎:我不想听起来像在重复自己。

于是,当我上播客,或者被邀请对一群人讲话时,我会躲开那些我已经讲得很成熟的观点。我的脑子一片空白,只能硬挤点话出来,避免尴尬的停顿。我总想现场掏出一个“炸裂的新想法”。可我也知道,想法不是这么来的。想法需要时间去拆解、去探索。

无论你对 Jordan Peterson 的看法是什么,他的表达能力都很吸引人。为什么?看他的作品积累就知道了。如果你想在某个主题上表达得好,但你在这个主题上还没有“作品体量”,那你可能需要重新评估:你面前还有多少工作要做。

你为什么会听你最喜欢的音乐人?

因为他们有一种你喜欢的声音或风格。他们的大多数作品听起来都很像,只是有细微变化。你听几秒就知道是谁。

如果一个 EDM 音乐人突然决定改做乡村,他的第一首往往会很糟——因为第一版通常都很糟——而且他的大多数听众也不会喜欢。

作为创作者、写作者、演讲者,或者任何想更会表达的人,也是一样。

你需要写作或开口说上成千上万次,直到你的“最佳观点”变得显而易见。按道理说,你必须重复自己,因为最重要的观点值得被重复——否则你怎么把它们打磨到锋利?

你可以把这些“核心大观点”理解为:一条条“推文长度”的钩子。

在我的写作里,有几个我反复讨论的主题:一人公司模型、如何得到你想要的生活、如何掌控心智、生活方式设计……等等。

对每一个内容支柱,我都有几条短内容——一针见血、很“能打”。

我越做越觉得:播客里最会说的人,往往不会按字面去回答主持人那个问题。

他们不会说:“嗯,好问题。我以前讲过这个——答案是……”

相反,他们会很有把握地抛出自己在这个主题上最好的那条观点,然后再用支撑点把它展开。这样不仅能让听众一直被吸住(节目效果更好,也更容易有人持续邀请你——成功会复利),而且还非常适合被剪成“可传播的片段”。如果这条观点以前已经爆过,那么当别人把你说这段剪出来发短视频时,它很可能还会再爆一次。

Alex Hormozi 就特别擅长这一点。

如果一个播客主持人问他:“在今天的世界,你能学到的最重要技能是什么?”

Hormozi 当然可以说“销售”或“做 offer(Offer creation)”。但他知道这事有层级,所以他更可能用自己第二火的那条推文来回答:

“你能培养的最重要的单一技能,是在没有任何值得开心的事情时,仍然能保持好心情的能力。”

这不仅是观众意料之外的东西(因此足够新颖),还会把 Hormozi 和主持人都推向一段更有意思的对话——人们也更愿意听下去。

而且这句话已经有 10.5 万赞。所以当它被剪成片段传播时,Hormozi 只做了一个很小的选择:把那条具体观点讲清楚——就会比他硬要现场“说点新的”带来大得多的结果。

好,那怎么从入门到进阶去练?

现在订阅

3 个让你更聪明表达的方法

如果你不知道该学什么,就从写作开始。不是因为写作是什么你停不下来的捷径,而是因为写作会教你如何思考、如何学习、以及如何让别人关心你在做的事。

我会说自己是写作者,但我其实不把自己当成传统意义上的写作者。

我不太在乎语法。我不太在乎自己听起来有多“聪明”(大多数时候)。我也不太在乎句子是不是会有点跑、读起来是不是最顺。但即便如此,还是有几百万人在我的各个平台点下关注或订阅。

在这段旅程里我越来越确定:写作远不只是把句子串起来、当作职业选择那么简单。

如果你想变得更会表达,你应该从写作开始——更准确地说,是开始有意识地写作。因为你每天都在写。

你给家人朋友发消息。你给潜在客户、客户和同事发邮件。根据你的工作,你可能还会写项目大纲、反馈、提案等等。

认真想想,媒体的基础(也就是你或你的雇主如何把工作呈现在人们面前、说服他们在意,从而让你能生存并获得报酬)本质上就是写作。只是媒体载体变了。你想在任何事情上做成结果,就必须去注意力所在的地方。现在注意力在社交媒体、YouTube、播客,以及像 Facebook 广告这样的投放上。而这些几乎都要求你能把话讲得有说服力:视频脚本、帖子、销售文案、配文……几乎一切。

这也是为什么我建议你每天早上养成 1–2 小时的写作习惯。这也是为什么我做了 2 hour writer

这就是你练习把想法讲清楚的方式。额外的好处是:当你把想法公开发布,你会从互动里得到直接反馈,知道哪些最有冲击力。建立受众也不坏——免费的分发对你的作品、产品或服务都很有价值。

那具体怎么练?下面这 3 个框架就够你起步了。

它们能让你轻松超过那些“毫无计划就开始”的人。

入门:微型故事(The Micro Story)

大脑是一台“故事引擎”。

人类很难不去注意一个故事,尤其是当它短、但有冲击力时。一旦你学会把故事讲好,你就能有效地“短路”别人的大脑,让他们对你要讲的话题产生兴趣。

故事的核心是“转变”。这种转变不必发生在某个具体的人身上。它可以简单到:提出一个问题,然后给出一个解决方案

如果你想让它更有力量,可以按这个结构来组织:

  • 问题(Problem):说出一个你观察到或亲身经历过的、能引起共鸣的问题。
  • 放大(Amplify):说明如果这个问题不解决,会带来怎样的负面结果。
  • 解决方案(Solution):给出解决办法。在短内容里,它可以是一句话或一个短列表;在长通讯或脚本里,它可以是所有关键点及其解释。“问题 + 放大”就是开头的钩子。

如果你学过一点文案(copywriting),你一定见过这个结构。做了 6 年之后,它仍然是我需要快速把一个想法讲清楚时的首选:我有一个观点,就会立刻去想,它对应的“问题”是什么?

当然,这个方法默认你已经有一个想写的想法。

如果没有,你就得去“打猎”。读老书、在某个主题里钻兔子洞、听一个新播客,或者干脆坐下来跟着自己的念头走,直到碰到一个足够锋利的洞见。

当你在“打猎”时,你不是让信息左耳进右耳出。你是在捕捉一个你会想:“我真希望这段是我写的。”的想法。

把它记下来,别让它溜走。

然后用这些框架把它用你自己的话重新说一遍,让它长成新的形状。

进阶:金字塔原理(The Pyramid Principle)

金字塔原理是一种沟通框架:用层级化、逻辑化的方式组织观点,让信息更容易被理解,也更有说服力。

它很简单:

  • 先给出核心观点(关键结论或建议)
  • 用关键论点支撑它(通常 3–5 个要点)
  • 再补上细节证据(数据、例子、分析)

当下很多内容把答案拖到最后才给,而这个框架是“答案先行”。

这和我们前面 Hormozi 的播客例子非常契合。

如果他对“你能学的最重要技能是什么?”的回答是:

“你能培养的最重要的单一技能,是在没有任何值得开心的事情时,仍然能保持好心情的能力。”

这句话就是金字塔顶端的答案。

接着,他用几个关键论点解释为什么这是最重要的技能。你只需要连续问自己 3–5 次“为什么”,并给出扎实的理由。

之后,再补上:自己生活里的例子、关于好心情的数据、或者来自客户的故事。

所以,这个框架非常适合用来:在通讯、长线程、YouTube 视频里扩展关键点;也同样适合用来在播客里回答问题。

从一个好观点开始,为它建立论证,再用数据和例子把它钉牢。

如果你写着写着/说着说着就卡住,那么下一个框架会很有帮助。

高阶:跨领域综合(Cross Domain Synthesis)

这是我最喜欢的,因为我兴趣很多。

我很难只专注一个主题或一个细分领域。我喜欢研究心理学、哲学、商业、设计、科技、健康……几乎所有能让我更好生活的工具。

除了像这篇这样聚焦单一主题的文章外,我的大多数通讯通常都按这个结构来写:

  • 问题 + 放大(Problem and amplify):开头提出一个能引起共鸣的问题,并展示不解决会发生什么。
  • 跨领域综合(Cross-domain synthesis):从你其他兴趣里抓模式或概念来支撑论证。比如我在讲 deep work(深度工作) 时,可以借用物理学里的 entropy(熵) 来说明分心是如何运作的。这样读者会学到新东西,而我也能安心:市面上绝大多数深度工作内容都不会这么写。
  • 独特流程或解决方案(Unique process or solution):列出最能解决开头问题的步骤或想法,从而完成“转变”。这些最好来自你自己的思考,而不是照搬别人的处方。

写作落地时,你会有:标题、提出问题的开头、一段讲另一个学科概念的内容,然后用多个小节展开你独特的解决方式(每个小节对应一个关键点)。

问题在于:这样很容易写成很长的东西——通讯、书的一章、YouTube 视频,甚至一期个人播客。

如果你刚开始练,你会盯着空白屏幕发呆:每一节到底要怎么填?

好消息是:写作就像用“想法”搭乐高,而想法有一些可预测的形态。你理解这些形态,就能引导自己继续往下写。下面是一些简单好用的“积木”:

  • 痛点(Pain point):不知道怎么开一节时,就从相关痛点写起,想法会顺着流出来。
  • 例子(Example):一旦开了头,随时塞进一个例子,让你说的东西落地。
  • 个人故事(Personal story):想想你人生里与之相关的一段经历,放哪儿都行。
  • 统计数据(Statistic):找一个真实的统计数据,为观点增加权威感。
  • 隐喻(Metaphor):把复杂概念讲得像在对小孩解释。Alan Watts 在这方面非常厉害。
  • 引用(Quote):放一句能为你观点背书的引用。引用很省力,因为它们几乎总是好观点。
  • 重构视角(Reframe):给读者一个不同角度去看你刚讲的点。
  • 什么 / 怎么 / 为什么(What, how, why):实在不行,就问自己:是什么?怎么做?为什么?思考就是提问。

这些就是构成我大多数大纲的“乐高积木”。我会在脑子里不停轮着用它们。等你熟练之后,它会变成第二天性,你的思考方式也会开始被重塑。

希望这些足够帮你起步。

—— Dan

这里还有一些进一步的资源,帮助你写作和表达:

相关笔记

🧭 主题 MOC

  • [[创作系统 MOC|创作系统]]:(MOC) 以「表达」为核心,提供写作/口头输出的框架与训练路径,属于创作能力的系统化方法。

🎯 结构化表达:结论先行

  • [[40 Library/41 读书笔记/麦肯锡结构化战略思维/2024-03-31-18-29-03|金字塔图示]]:(麦肯锡结构化战略思维) 用「金字塔原理」把观点按「结论先行」组织,降低理解成本,让表达更「清晰」。

⚙️ 训练与打磨:把想法写出来

  • [[40 Library/41 读书笔记/九宫格写作法/2023-02-15-09-28-59|解释练习]]:(九宫格写作法) 用“讲给别人听”检验是否真的「理解」,倒逼你把概念说得「通俗易懂」。
  • [[30 Wiki/32 创作_表达/2024-03-01-20-48-47|写作=训练]]:(Wiki) 把「写作」视为训练环境、把「认知」当作参数更新,呼应“反复输出→形成自己的「金曲专辑」”。

🔗 故事与共鸣:让观点被听进去

  • [[40 Library/41 读书笔记/故事力/2024-11-30-10-04-11|理性×感性]]:(故事力) 用「理性线×情感线」把事实与共鸣同时给到,让「故事」成为更强的说服载体。
  • [[40 Library/41 读书笔记/能力陷阱/2023-10-26-10-52-30|自我叙事]]:(能力陷阱) 用「个人故事」讲清“你是谁/想去哪”,把表达从信息堆砌升级为可复述的「意义」。

🔗 原理校准:表达是在做“减熵”

  • [[30 Wiki/33 商业_创业/P- 沟通能力决定是减熵还是增熵,需要重视并刻意练习|沟通减熵]]:(Wiki) 把高质量「沟通」理解为「减熵」:关键信息尽量无损传递,避免“词不达意”的返工与冲突。

⚔️ 反面张力:聪明输出 vs 开放探询

  • [[40 Library/41 读书笔记/改变提问改变人生/2025-04-15-13-30-02|深度倾听]]:(改变提问改变人生) 先用「倾听」收集真实情绪与担忧,再开口才更容易做到“对方听得懂”的「表达」。
  • [[00 Inbox/Flomo_Import/2022-10-28-23-19-08|杜绝装懂]]:(Flomo) 反对为了显得「聪明」而“不懂装懂”,提醒清晰表达的底层是诚实地承认边界与未知。

This newsletter did way better than I expected.

这期通讯的反响比我预想的好太多。

I turned it into a video for those interested (or continue reading below):

我把它也做成了视频,想看视频的可以去看(不看也可以继续往下读):



When I was young, I was always drawn to people who sounded intelligent.

小时候,我总是会被那些“听起来很聪明”的人吸引。

People like Alan Watts, Jordan Peterson, Daniel Schmachtenberger, or other individuals who could explain deep ideas in an exciting yet palatable way. Most of the time, I didn’t understand what they were saying (because either I was too young or they overcomplicated everything they said), but since it sounded smart and articulate, I listened anyway and gave them my respect.

比如 Alan Watts、Jordan Peterson、Daniel Schmachtenberger,或者任何能把深刻的东西讲得既有趣、又让人听得懂的人。多数时候我其实不太明白他们在说什么(要么我太小,要么他们把事情讲得太复杂),但因为他们说得像那么回事——清晰、笃定、很会表达——我还是会听下去,并且天然地给他们尊重。

The thing is, I never thought I could do the same.

关键是:我从没觉得自己也能做到。

I thought these people were inherently more intelligent than I was.

我以为这些人就是天生更聪明。

I didn’t think my brain had the capacity to do that. I was a smart kid in school, but being good at taking tests is a much different skill than stringing together coherent thoughts and articulating them to someone else.

我不觉得自己的大脑有那种“把想法讲得很顺、很有力量”的能力。我在学校算聪明,但擅长考试和把零散的念头串成一条清晰的链条、再说给别人听,是两种完全不同的技能。

I felt like I had to memorize entire books worth of information so that I could recite it on the spot, because I was trained to learn that way.

所以我一直以为:要想讲得好,我得背下整本书的内容,才能随时随地“拿得出来”——因为我就是被这样训练的。

But now, over a decade later, and without really trying to become articulate... people ask me how I write and speak so well.

但十多年过去了,我甚至没有刻意去练“表达能力”……现在反而会有人来问,为什么我写作和讲话这么清楚。

Over the past 6 years, millions of people have chosen to hit the follow or subscribe button on my social media accounts, newsletter, and YouTube channel. I’m not an entertainer. I’m not that funny either. I’m actually quite boring (which I like). I wouldn’t even say that my content is eloquent or revolutionary. I can, however, attribute most of that success to being able to articulate valuable ideas in a way that people are drawn to. And... It’s not that difficult to do.

过去 6 年,有几百万人在我的社交媒体、通讯和 YouTube 频道点下关注或订阅。我不是娱乐型创作者,也不太好笑。说实话我挺无聊的(我还挺享受这种无聊)。我也不觉得自己的内容多么华丽或颠覆。但我能把大部分结果归因于一件事:我能把有价值的想法说得让人愿意听下去。并且——这件事没你想的那么难。

So, maybe you’re a new creator who wants to stand out. Maybe you’re going on a podcast and don’t want to stumble over your words (because you don’t have a script). Maybe you want to command presence in a company meeting or sales call. Or, maybe you just want to be a more interesting person.

也许你是新创作者,想脱颖而出;也许你要上播客,但不想因为没有脚本而卡壳;也许你想在公司会议或销售电话里更有存在感;又或者,你只是想成为一个更有意思的人。

I’ve come up with 3 methods to articulate yourself intelligently, and I’ve ordered them from beginner to advanced. These are what I use when it’s time to write or speak. I’ve also included a few resources to help with this at the very end.

我把“如何更聪明地表达自己”总结成 3 个方法,并按从入门到进阶排列。它们就是我在需要写作或开口表达时会用的工具。最后我还会附一些资源,方便你继续练习。

But there’s something more important that must come before.

但在谈方法之前,有个更重要的底座。

First, we need to build our inner album of greatest hits.

你得先建立自己的“金曲专辑”。

The Inner Album Of Greatest Hits

内心的“金曲专辑”(The Inner Album Of Greatest Hits)

如果你想聪明地表达自己,你需要一个由 8–10 个“核心大观点”组成的池子,这些观点几乎能连接到任何话题。这样当你需要在任何场景写作或讲话时,你就有一个你已经反复想过几百次的起点。

If you want to articulate yourself intelligently, you need a pool of 8-10 of your biggest ideas that can be connected to almost any topic. Then, when it’s time to write or speak in any situation, you have a starting point that you’ve already thought through hundreds of times before.

最近我开始被邀请去更大的播客。

而这些播客跟我作为新人的时候参加的,完全不是一个量级。

I’ve been getting invited onto more big podcasts.

这里面有很多东西“押在台上”。大播客会在制作上投入大量预算(往往远超你的想象)。这很让人紧张。因为可能会有几十万人听到,你会觉得自己有责任把价值给足。

But these are much, much different than the ones I was invited on as a beginner creator.

我还不是最好的播客嘉宾。

There is a lot on the line. These big podcasters pour tens of thousands of dollars (if not more) into the quality of their production. It’s nerve-racking. And since hundreds of thousands of people may listen to the podcast, I feel like I am responsible for providing as much value as I possibly can.

每次回听,我都会懊悔:那句话明明可以说得更好。

I’m not the best podcast guest yet.

这就带来一个问题。

When I listen back to them, I’m always kicking myself about how I could have said something better.

我写过 2 本书。

And that leads to the problem.

写过几千条社交内容。

I’ve written 2 books.

写过几百期通讯和 YouTube 视频。

Thousands of social posts.

对我来说,哪些想法最有价值很清楚;哪些想法浏览量最高、哪些想法会带来最多私信说“这改变了我”,也很清楚。说到底,我其实只有 8–10 个能代表我品牌、也最能体现我能提供价值的“大观点”。我花了无数小时打磨它们。

Hundreds of newsletters and YouTube videos.

这些才是人们真正想听的东西。

It’s obvious to me which ideas are the most valuable. It’s obvious which ideas have the most views or have led to the most DMs about how this “changed their life.” It’s obvious that I really only have 8-10 big ideas that represent my brand and the value I can provide. I’ve spent countless hours refining those ideas.

这些也是新听众认识我的最快入口。

Those are the ideas people want to hear.

但这恰恰是我最大的心理坎:我不想听起来像在重复自己。

Those are the ideas that introduce new listeners to who I am.

于是,当我上播客,或者被邀请对一群人讲话时,我会躲开那些我已经讲得很成熟的观点。我的脑子一片空白,只能硬挤点话出来,避免尴尬的停顿。我总想现场掏出一个“炸裂的新想法”。可我也知道,想法不是这么来的。想法需要时间去拆解、去探索。

But that’s my biggest mental hurdle... I don’t want to sound like I’m repeating myself.

无论你对 Jordan Peterson 的看法是什么,他的表达能力都很吸引人。为什么?看他的作品积累就知道了。如果你想在某个主题上表达得好,但你在这个主题上还没有“作品体量”,那你可能需要重新评估:你面前还有多少工作要做。

So when I get on a podcast, or am asked to speak in front of a crowd, I avoid saying the things that I’ve already said well. My mind goes blank and I have to force something out to avoid an awkwardly long pause. I want to somehow come up with this mindblowing idea on the spot, when I know that’s not how ideas work. Ideas require time to dissect and explore.

你为什么会听你最喜欢的音乐人?

Jordan Peterson, regardless of your opinion, is known for his articulation. It’s captivating. Why? Look at his body of work and it’s obvious. If you do not have a body of work around the topics you wish to articulate yourself, you may want to increase your expectations as to the work you have ahead of you.

因为他们有一种你喜欢的声音或风格。他们的大多数作品听起来都很像,只是有细微变化。你听几秒就知道是谁。

Now, why do you listen to your favorite musician?

如果一个 EDM 音乐人突然决定改做乡村,他的第一首往往会很糟——因为第一版通常都很糟——而且他的大多数听众也不会喜欢。

Because they have a specific sound or style that you enjoy. Most of their music sounds the same with slight variations here and there. You can listen to a few seconds of their song and know exactly which artist plays it.

作为创作者、写作者、演讲者,或者任何想更会表达的人,也是一样。

If an EDM artist immediately decided to switch to country music, their first track would be horrible, as most first iterations are, and most of their audience would not like it.

你需要写作或开口说上成千上万次,直到你的“最佳观点”变得显而易见。按道理说,你必须重复自己,因为最重要的观点值得被重复——否则你怎么把它们打磨到锋利?

The same applies to being a creator, writer, speaker, or just a person who wants to be able to articulate themselves.

你可以把这些“核心大观点”理解为:一条条“推文长度”的钩子。

在我的写作里,有几个我反复讨论的主题:一人公司模型、如何得到你想要的生活、如何掌控心智、生活方式设计……等等。

You need to write or speak, thousands of times, until your best ideas are obvious. By nature, you must repeat yourself, because the most important ideas deserve to be repeated, and how else are you going to refine them?

对每一个内容支柱,我都有几条短内容——一针见血、很“能打”。

我越做越觉得:播客里最会说的人,往往不会按字面去回答主持人那个问题。

You can think of these “big ideas” as tweets.

他们不会说:“嗯,好问题。我以前讲过这个——答案是……”

In my writing, I have a few topics that I talk about frequently: the one-person business model, how to get what you want in life, how to master your mind, lifestyle design, etc.

相反,他们会很有把握地抛出自己在这个主题上最好的那条观点,然后再用支撑点把它展开。这样不仅能让听众一直被吸住(节目效果更好,也更容易有人持续邀请你——成功会复利),而且还非常适合被剪成“可传播的片段”。如果这条观点以前已经爆过,那么当别人把你说这段剪出来发短视频时,它很可能还会再爆一次。

For each of those content pillars, I have a few short-form tweets I’ve written that hit hard.

Alex Hormozi 就特别擅长这一点。

When I think about it, the best speakers on a podcast are those who don’t answer the question the host asks directly.

如果一个播客主持人问他:“在今天的世界,你能学到的最重要技能是什么?”

They don’t say, “Umm well, good question, I’ve talked about that topic before and here’s the answer.”

Hormozi 当然可以说“销售”或“做 offer(Offer creation)”。但他知道这事有层级,所以他更可能用自己第二火的那条推文来回答:

Instead, they speak their best idea on that topic with confidence, then expand on it with supporting points. Not only does this keep the listener engaged, leading to the podcast doing better and more people wanting you to come on their podcasts (compounding into more success for you), but it’s also a clippable moment. If your idea has already gone viral, it will probably do so again when they post the clip of you speaking.

“你能培养的最重要的单一技能,是在没有任何值得开心的事情时,仍然能保持好心情的能力。”

Alex Hormozi is great at this.

这不仅是观众意料之外的东西(因此足够新颖),还会把 Hormozi 和主持人都推向一段更有意思的对话——人们也更愿意听下去。

If a podcast host were to ask him, “What’s the greatest skill you can learn in today’s world?”

而且这句话已经有 10.5 万赞。所以当它被剪成片段传播时,Hormozi 只做了一个很小的选择:把那条具体观点讲清楚——就会比他硬要现场“说点新的”带来大得多的结果。

Hormozi could just say “sales” or “offer creation,” but he understands that there are levels to this, so he would probably respond with his second most viral tweet:

好,那怎么从入门到进阶去练?

“The single greatest skill you can develop is the ability to stay in a great mood in the absence of things to be in a great mood about.”

Not only is that something the audience wouldn’t expect, meaning it’s novel, but it sets both Hormozi and the host up for an interesting conversation that people want to listen to.

3 个让你更聪明表达的方法

And, it already has 105 thousand likes, so when it’s clipped, that simple decision from Hormozi to articulate that specific idea will lead to exponentially more results than if he were to try to say something new.

如果你不知道该学什么,就从写作开始。不是因为写作是什么你停不下来的捷径,而是因为写作会教你如何思考、如何学习、以及如何让别人关心你在做的事。

Makes sense, but how do we actually practice this, from beginner to advanced?

我会说自己是写作者,但我其实不把自己当成传统意义上的写作者。

我不太在乎语法。我不太在乎自己听起来有多“聪明”(大多数时候)。我也不太在乎句子是不是会有点跑、读起来是不是最顺。但即便如此,还是有几百万人在我的各个平台点下关注或订阅。

3 Methods To Articulate Yourself Intelligently

在这段旅程里我越来越确定:写作远不只是把句子串起来、当作职业选择那么简单。

如果你想变得更会表达,你应该从写作开始——更准确地说,是开始有意识地写作。因为你每天都在写。

If you don’t know what to learn, start writing. Not because writing is some shortcut your can’t stop looking for, but because writing teaches you how to think, how to learn, and how to inspire people to care about what you do.

你给家人朋友发消息。你给潜在客户、客户和同事发邮件。根据你的工作,你可能还会写项目大纲、反馈、提案等等。

认真想想,媒体的基础(也就是你或你的雇主如何把工作呈现在人们面前、说服他们在意,从而让你能生存并获得报酬)本质上就是写作。只是媒体载体变了。你想在任何事情上做成结果,就必须去注意力所在的地方。现在注意力在社交媒体、YouTube、播客,以及像 Facebook 广告这样的投放上。而这些几乎都要求你能把话讲得有说服力:视频脚本、帖子、销售文案、配文……几乎一切。

I call myself a writer, but I don’t actually consider myself one.

这也是为什么我建议你每天早上养成 1–2 小时的写作习惯。这也是为什么我做了 2 hour writer

I don’t care about grammar. I don’t care about how clever I sound (most of the time). I don’t care if my sentences run on and don’t read the best. Yet millions of people have made the choice to hit the follow or subscribe button across my social channels.

这就是你练习把想法讲清楚的方式。额外的好处是:当你把想法公开发布,你会从互动里得到直接反馈,知道哪些最有冲击力。建立受众也不坏——免费的分发对你的作品、产品或服务都很有价值。

Throughout my journey as a “writer,” I’ve realized that writing is so much more than stringing sentences together as a choice of vocation.

那具体怎么练?下面这 3 个框架就够你起步了。

If you want to become articulate, you should probably start writing. That is, you should start writing intentionally, because you already write every single day.

它们能让你轻松超过那些“毫无计划就开始”的人。

You text your family and friends. You email your prospects, clients, and coworkers. And depending on your work, you may write project outlines, feedback, proposals, and more.

入门:微型故事(The Micro Story)

If you really think about it, the foundation of media (which is how you or your employer gets your work in front of people and persuades them to care about your work, so you can survive and get paid) is writing. Now, media has evolved. If you want to succeed in any venture, you must go where the attention is. Right now, the attention is on social media, YouTube, podcasts, and advertisements like Facebook ads. All of which require you to articulate persuasively in the form of video scripts, posts, sales copywriting, post captions, and anywhere else that someone is reading a written post or spoken script, which is nearly everything.

大脑是一台“故事引擎”。

That’s why I recommend a 1-2 hour writing habit every morning. That’s why I created 2 hour writer.

人类很难不去注意一个故事,尤其是当它短、但有冲击力时。一旦你学会把故事讲好,你就能有效地“短路”别人的大脑,让他们对你要讲的话题产生兴趣。

That’s how you practice articulating your ideas. As a bonus, by posting your ideas in public, you get direct feedback in the form of engagement as to which are the most impactful. Building an audience also doesn’t hurt. Free distribution for your work, product, or service is great.

故事的核心是“转变”。这种转变不必发生在某个具体的人身上。它可以简单到:提出一个问题,然后给出一个解决方案

With that said, how do you actually start practicing articulation in the form of writing?

如果你想让它更有力量,可以按这个结构来组织:

Here are 3 frameworks.

  • 问题(Problem):说出一个你观察到或亲身经历过的、能引起共鸣的问题。
  • 放大(Amplify):说明如果这个问题不解决,会带来怎样的负面结果。
  • 解决方案(Solution):给出解决办法。在短内容里,它可以是一句话或一个短列表;在长通讯或脚本里,它可以是所有关键点及其解释。“问题 + 放大”就是开头的钩子。

These alone will help you blow past everyone else who starts without a plan.

如果你学过一点文案(copywriting),你一定见过这个结构。做了 6 年之后,它仍然是我需要快速把一个想法讲清楚时的首选:我有一个观点,就会立刻去想,它对应的“问题”是什么?

Beginner – The Micro Story

当然,这个方法默认你已经有一个想写的想法。

The mind is a story engine.

如果没有,你就得去“打猎”。读老书、在某个主题里钻兔子洞、听一个新播客,或者干脆坐下来跟着自己的念头走,直到碰到一个足够锋利的洞见。

Humans can’t help but pay attention to a story, especially if it’s short and impactful. Once you learn how to do it well, you can effectively short-circuit someone’s brain into being interested in the topic you are talking about.

当你在“打猎”时,你不是让信息左耳进右耳出。你是在捕捉一个你会想:“我真希望这段是我写的。”的想法。

The foundation of a story is transformation. This does not have to be a transformation about a specific person. A transformation can be as simple as introducing a problem and giving a solution.

把它记下来,别让它溜走。

If we want to make that a bit more impactful, here’s how you structure what you want to say:

然后用这些框架把它用你自己的话重新说一遍,让它长成新的形状。

-

进阶:金字塔原理(The Pyramid Principle)

Problem – state a relatable problem that you’ve observed or experienced before.

金字塔原理是一种沟通框架:用层级化、逻辑化的方式组织观点,让信息更容易被理解,也更有说服力。

-

它很简单:

Amplify – illustrate how that problem leads to a negative outcome if it is not solved.

  • 先给出核心观点(关键结论或建议)
  • 用关键论点支撑它(通常 3–5 个要点)
  • 再补上细节证据(数据、例子、分析)

-

当下很多内容把答案拖到最后才给,而这个框架是“答案先行”。

Solution – state the solution to the problem. In a short post, this can be one sentence or a short list. In a long newsletter or script, this can be all of the key points with their explanations. The problem and amplification would account for the hook.

这和我们前面 Hormozi 的播客例子非常契合。

If you’ve studied copywriting at all, you’ve seen this before. After 6 years of doing this, it’s still my go-to when I need a way to articulate a thought fast. I have an idea and immediately start thinking of a problem related to it.

如果他对“你能学的最重要技能是什么?”的回答是:

Now, of course, this is assuming you already have an idea to write about.

“你能培养的最重要的单一技能,是在没有任何值得开心的事情时,仍然能保持好心情的能力。”

If you don’t, you need to hunt for them. You need to read old books, go down rabbit holes on a topic, listen to a new podcast, or just sit with your thoughts and follow them until you reach a compelling insight.

这句话就是金字塔顶端的答案。

When you “hunt” for an idea, you aren’t just letting the information go in one ear and out the other. You are listening intently for an idea that you wish you wrote.

接着,他用几个关键论点解释为什么这是最重要的技能。你只需要连续问自己 3–5 次“为什么”,并给出扎实的理由。

Then you jot it down so you don’t lose it.

之后,再补上:自己生活里的例子、关于好心情的数据、或者来自客户的故事。

Then you articulate it in your own words using these frameworks so that it takes a new shape.

所以,这个框架非常适合用来:在通讯、长线程、YouTube 视频里扩展关键点;也同样适合用来在播客里回答问题。

Intermediate – The Pyramid Principle

从一个好观点开始,为它建立论证,再用数据和例子把它钉牢。

The Pyramid Principle is a communication framework that structures ideas in a hierarchical, logical way to make information more palatable and persuasive.

如果你写着写着/说着说着就卡住,那么下一个框架会很有帮助。

It’s pretty simple.

高阶:跨领域综合(Cross Domain Synthesis)

-

这是我最喜欢的,因为我兴趣很多。

Start with the main idea (the key conclusion or recommendation)

我很难只专注一个主题或一个细分领域。我喜欢研究心理学、哲学、商业、设计、科技、健康……几乎所有能让我更好生活的工具。

-

除了像这篇这样聚焦单一主题的文章外,我的大多数通讯通常都按这个结构来写:

Support it with key arguments (usually 3-5 key points)

  • 问题 + 放大(Problem and amplify):开头提出一个能引起共鸣的问题,并展示不解决会发生什么。
  • 跨领域综合(Cross-domain synthesis):从你其他兴趣里抓模式或概念来支撑论证。比如我在讲 deep work(深度工作) 时,可以借用物理学里的 entropy(熵) 来说明分心是如何运作的。这样读者会学到新东西,而我也能安心:市面上绝大多数深度工作内容都不会这么写。
  • 独特流程或解决方案(Unique process or solution):列出最能解决开头问题的步骤或想法,从而完成“转变”。这些最好来自你自己的思考,而不是照搬别人的处方。

-

写作落地时,你会有:标题、提出问题的开头、一段讲另一个学科概念的内容,然后用多个小节展开你独特的解决方式(每个小节对应一个关键点)。

Provide detailed evidence (data, examples, analysis)

问题在于:这样很容易写成很长的东西——通讯、书的一章、YouTube 视频,甚至一期个人播客。

Unlike most content today that waits to give you the answer until the end of the video, this takes an answer-first approach.

如果你刚开始练,你会盯着空白屏幕发呆:每一节到底要怎么填?

This works perfectly with our example from before about Hormozi on a podcast.

好消息是:写作就像用“想法”搭乐高,而想法有一些可预测的形态。你理解这些形态,就能引导自己继续往下写。下面是一些简单好用的“积木”:

If his answer to “What is the greatest skill to learn?” was:

  • 痛点(Pain point):不知道怎么开一节时,就从相关痛点写起,想法会顺着流出来。
  • 例子(Example):一旦开了头,随时塞进一个例子,让你说的东西落地。
  • 个人故事(Personal story):想想你人生里与之相关的一段经历,放哪儿都行。
  • 统计数据(Statistic):找一个真实的统计数据,为观点增加权威感。
  • 隐喻(Metaphor):把复杂概念讲得像在对小孩解释。Alan Watts 在这方面非常厉害。
  • 引用(Quote):放一句能为你观点背书的引用。引用很省力,因为它们几乎总是好观点。
  • 重构视角(Reframe):给读者一个不同角度去看你刚讲的点。
  • 什么 / 怎么 / 为什么(What, how, why):实在不行,就问自己:是什么?怎么做?为什么?思考就是提问。

“The single greatest skill you can develop is the ability to stay in a great mood in the absence of things to be in a great mood about.”

这些就是构成我大多数大纲的“乐高积木”。我会在脑子里不停轮着用它们。等你熟练之后,它会变成第二天性,你的思考方式也会开始被重塑。

That can serve as the answer at the top of the pyramid.

希望这些足够帮你起步。

Then, he could support it with key arguments as to why that is the greatest skill to learn. All you have to do is ask why 3-5 times and provide solid reasoning.

—— Dan

After that, he can give examples from his own life, data about being in a great mood, or anecdotes from clients.

这里还有一些进一步的资源,帮助你写作和表达:

So, this is a great way to either expand on key points in a newsletter, thread, or YouTube video. And of course, it can be used as a way to respond to questions on a podcast.

相关笔记

Start with a great idea, make an argument about it, then support it with data.

🧭 主题 MOC

  • [[创作系统 MOC|创作系统]]:(MOC) 以「表达」为核心,提供写作/口头输出的框架与训练路径,属于创作能力的系统化方法。

Now, if you struggle to continue writing or speaking, this next framework will help with that.

🎯 结构化表达:结论先行

  • [[40 Library/41 读书笔记/麦肯锡结构化战略思维/2024-03-31-18-29-03|金字塔图示]]:(麦肯锡结构化战略思维) 用「金字塔原理」把观点按「结论先行」组织,降低理解成本,让表达更「清晰」。

Advanced – Cross Domain Synthesis

⚙️ 训练与打磨:把想法写出来

  • [[40 Library/41 读书笔记/九宫格写作法/2023-02-15-09-28-59|解释练习]]:(九宫格写作法) 用“讲给别人听”检验是否真的「理解」,倒逼你把概念说得「通俗易懂」。
  • [[30 Wiki/32 创作_表达/2024-03-01-20-48-47|写作=训练]]:(Wiki) 把「写作」视为训练环境、把「认知」当作参数更新,呼应“反复输出→形成自己的「金曲专辑」”。

This one is my favorite because I have multiple interests.

🔗 故事与共鸣:让观点被听进去

  • [[40 Library/41 读书笔记/故事力/2024-11-30-10-04-11|理性×感性]]:(故事力) 用「理性线×情感线」把事实与共鸣同时给到,让「故事」成为更强的说服载体。
  • [[40 Library/41 读书笔记/能力陷阱/2023-10-26-10-52-30|自我叙事]]:(能力陷阱) 用「个人故事」讲清“你是谁/想去哪”,把表达从信息堆砌升级为可复述的「意义」。

It’s hard for me to stick to one topic or niche. I love studying psychology, philosophy, business, design, tech, health, and really anything that gives me the tools to live a better life.

🔗 原理校准:表达是在做“减熵”

  • [[30 Wiki/33 商业_创业/P- 沟通能力决定是减熵还是增熵,需要重视并刻意练习|沟通减熵]]:(Wiki) 把高质量「沟通」理解为「减熵」:关键信息尽量无损传递,避免“词不达意”的返工与冲突。

This is how I tend to structure most of my newsletters, outside of the ones where I am focused on a singular topic (like this one).

⚔️ 反面张力:聪明输出 vs 开放探询

  • [[40 Library/41 读书笔记/改变提问改变人生/2025-04-15-13-30-02|深度倾听]]:(改变提问改变人生) 先用「倾听」收集真实情绪与担忧,再开口才更容易做到“对方听得懂”的「表达」。
  • [[00 Inbox/Flomo_Import/2022-10-28-23-19-08|杜绝装懂]]:(Flomo) 反对为了显得「聪明」而“不懂装懂”,提醒清晰表达的底层是诚实地承认边界与未知。

Here it is:

-

Problem and amplify – your introduction should state a relatable problem and illustrate what happens if that problem is not solved.

-

Cross-domain synthesis – note patterns or concepts from your other interests that help support your argument. If I’m talking about deep work, I can use the concept of entropy from physics to illustrate how distraction works. This teaches my audience something new, and I can sleep well knowing that all other deep work content out there does not do this.

-

Unique process or solution – give a list of ideas or steps that best solve the problem you introduced at the beginning, solidifying the transformation. These should come from your own contemplation rather than someone else’s prescription.

In practice, you would have the title of your piece, the introduction with the problem, a section that teaches a concept from another discipline or interest, then a unique way to solve the problem in the form of multiple sections describing each key point.

The problem here is that this leads to something very long like a newsletter, book chapter, YouTube video, or even a solo podcast.

If you’re just starting out, you’ll be staring at a blank screen because you don’t know how to fill in each section.

When I was young, I was always drawn to people who sounded intelligent.

People like Alan Watts, Jordan Peterson, Daniel Schmachtenberger, or other individuals who could explain deep ideas in an exciting yet palatable way. Most of the time, I didn’t understand what they were saying (because either I was too young or they overcomplicated everything they said), but since it sounded smart and articulate, I listened anyway and gave them my respect.

The thing is, I never thought I could do the same.

I thought these people were inherently more intelligent than I was.

I didn’t think my brain had the capacity to do that. I was a smart kid in school, but being good at taking tests is a much different skill than stringing together coherent thoughts and articulating them to someone else.

I felt like I had to memorize entire books worth of information so that I could recite it on the spot, because I was trained to learn that way.

But now, over a decade later, and without really trying to become articulate... people ask me how I write and speak so well.

Over the past 6 years, millions of people have chosen to hit the follow or subscribe button on my social media accounts, newsletter, and YouTube channel. I’m not an entertainer. I’m not that funny either. I’m actually quite boring (which I like). I wouldn’t even say that my content is eloquent or revolutionary. I can, however, attribute most of that success to being able to articulate valuable ideas in a way that people are drawn to. And... It’s not that difficult to do.

So, maybe you’re a new creator who wants to stand out. Maybe you’re going on a podcast and don’t want to stumble over your words (because you don’t have a script). Maybe you want to command presence in a company meeting or sales call. Or, maybe you just want to be a more interesting person.

I’ve come up with 3 methods to articulate yourself intelligently, and I’ve ordered them from beginner to advanced. These are what I use when it’s time to write or speak. I’ve also included a few resources to help with this at the very end.

But there’s something more important that must come before.

First, we need to build our inner album of greatest hits.

The Inner Album Of Greatest Hits

If you want to articulate yourself intelligently, you need a pool of 8-10 of your biggest ideas that can be connected to almost any topic. Then, when it’s time to write or speak in any situation, you have a starting point that you’ve already thought through hundreds of times before.

I’ve been getting invited onto more big podcasts.

But these are much, much different than the ones I was invited on as a beginner creator.

There is a lot on the line. These big podcasters pour tens of thousands of dollars (if not more) into the quality of their production. It’s nerve-racking. And since hundreds of thousands of people may listen to the podcast, I feel like I am responsible for providing as much value as I possibly can.

I’m not the best podcast guest yet.

When I listen back to them, I’m always kicking myself about how I could have said something better.

And that leads to the problem.

I’ve written 2 books.

Thousands of social posts.

Hundreds of newsletters and YouTube videos.

It’s obvious to me which ideas are the most valuable. It’s obvious which ideas have the most views or have led to the most DMs about how this “changed their life.” It’s obvious that I really only have 8-10 big ideas that represent my brand and the value I can provide. I’ve spent countless hours refining those ideas.

Those are the ideas people want to hear.

Those are the ideas that introduce new listeners to who I am.

But that’s my biggest mental hurdle... I don’t want to sound like I’m repeating myself.

So when I get on a podcast, or am asked to speak in front of a crowd, I avoid saying the things that I’ve already said well. My mind goes blank and I have to force something out to avoid an awkwardly long pause. I want to somehow come up with this mindblowing idea on the spot, when I know that’s not how ideas work. Ideas require time to dissect and explore.

Jordan Peterson, regardless of your opinion, is known for his articulation. It’s captivating. Why? Look at his body of work and it’s obvious. If you do not have a body of work around the topics you wish to articulate yourself, you may want to increase your expectations as to the work you have ahead of you.

Now, why do you listen to your favorite musician?

Because they have a specific sound or style that you enjoy. Most of their music sounds the same with slight variations here and there. You can listen to a few seconds of their song and know exactly which artist plays it.

If an EDM artist immediately decided to switch to country music, their first track would be horrible, as most first iterations are, and most of their audience would not like it.

The same applies to being a creator, writer, speaker, or just a person who wants to be able to articulate themselves.

You need to write or speak, thousands of times, until your best ideas are obvious. By nature, you must repeat yourself, because the most important ideas deserve to be repeated, and how else are you going to refine them?

You can think of these “big ideas” as tweets.

In my writing, I have a few topics that I talk about frequently: the one-person business model, how to get what you want in life, how to master your mind, lifestyle design, etc.

For each of those content pillars, I have a few short-form tweets I’ve written that hit hard.

When I think about it, the best speakers on a podcast are those who don’t answer the question the host asks directly.

They don’t say, “Umm well, good question, I’ve talked about that topic before and here’s the answer.”

Instead, they speak their best idea on that topic with confidence, then expand on it with supporting points. Not only does this keep the listener engaged, leading to the podcast doing better and more people wanting you to come on their podcasts (compounding into more success for you), but it’s also a clippable moment. If your idea has already gone viral, it will probably do so again when they post the clip of you speaking.

Alex Hormozi is great at this.

If a podcast host were to ask him, “What’s the greatest skill you can learn in today’s world?”

Hormozi could just say “sales” or “offer creation,” but he understands that there are levels to this, so he would probably respond with his second most viral tweet:

“The single greatest skill you can develop is the ability to stay in a great mood in the absence of things to be in a great mood about.”

Not only is that something the audience wouldn’t expect, meaning it’s novel, but it sets both Hormozi and the host up for an interesting conversation that people want to listen to.

And, it already has 105 thousand likes, so when it’s clipped, that simple decision from Hormozi to articulate that specific idea will lead to exponentially more results than if he were to try to say something new.

Makes sense, but how do we actually practice this, from beginner to advanced?

Subscribe now

3 Methods To Articulate Yourself Intelligently

If you don’t know what to learn, start writing. Not because writing is some shortcut your can’t stop looking for, but because writing teaches you how to think, how to learn, and how to inspire people to care about what you do.

I call myself a writer, but I don’t actually consider myself one.

I don’t care about grammar. I don’t care about how clever I sound (most of the time). I don’t care if my sentences run on and don’t read the best. Yet millions of people have made the choice to hit the follow or subscribe button across my social channels.

Throughout my journey as a “writer,” I’ve realized that writing is so much more than stringing sentences together as a choice of vocation.

If you want to become articulate, you should probably start writing. That is, you should start writing intentionally, because you already write every single day.

You text your family and friends. You email your prospects, clients, and coworkers. And depending on your work, you may write project outlines, feedback, proposals, and more.

If you really think about it, the foundation of media (which is how you or your employer gets your work in front of people and persuades them to care about your work, so you can survive and get paid) is writing. Now, media has evolved. If you want to succeed in any venture, you must go where the attention is. Right now, the attention is on social media, YouTube, podcasts, and advertisements like Facebook ads. All of which require you to articulate persuasively in the form of video scripts, posts, sales copywriting, post captions, and anywhere else that someone is reading a written post or spoken script, which is nearly everything.

That’s why I recommend a 1-2 hour writing habit every morning. That’s why I created 2 hour writer.

That’s how you practice articulating your ideas. As a bonus, by posting your ideas in public, you get direct feedback in the form of engagement as to which are the most impactful. Building an audience also doesn’t hurt. Free distribution for your work, product, or service is great.

With that said, how do you actually start practicing articulation in the form of writing?

Here are 3 frameworks.

These alone will help you blow past everyone else who starts without a plan.

Beginner – The Micro Story

The mind is a story engine.

Humans can’t help but pay attention to a story, especially if it’s short and impactful. Once you learn how to do it well, you can effectively short-circuit someone’s brain into being interested in the topic you are talking about.

The foundation of a story is transformation. This does not have to be a transformation about a specific person. A transformation can be as simple as introducing a problem and giving a solution.

If we want to make that a bit more impactful, here’s how you structure what you want to say:

Problem – state a relatable problem that you’ve observed or experienced before.

Amplify – illustrate how that problem leads to a negative outcome if it is not solved.

Solution – state the solution to the problem. In a short post, this can be one sentence or a short list. In a long newsletter or script, this can be all of the key points with their explanations. The problem and amplification would account for the hook.

If you’ve studied copywriting at all, you’ve seen this before. After 6 years of doing this, it’s still my go-to when I need a way to articulate a thought fast. I have an idea and immediately start thinking of a problem related to it.

Now, of course, this is assuming you already have an idea to write about.

If you don’t, you need to hunt for them. You need to read old books, go down rabbit holes on a topic, listen to a new podcast, or just sit with your thoughts and follow them until you reach a compelling insight.

When you “hunt” for an idea, you aren’t just letting the information go in one ear and out the other. You are listening intently for an idea that you wish you wrote.

Then you jot it down so you don’t lose it.

Then you articulate it in your own words using these frameworks so that it takes a new shape.

Intermediate – The Pyramid Principle

The Pyramid Principle is a communication framework that structures ideas in a hierarchical, logical way to make information more palatable and persuasive.

It’s pretty simple.

Start with the main idea (the key conclusion or recommendation)

Support it with key arguments (usually 3-5 key points)

Provide detailed evidence (data, examples, analysis)

Unlike most content today that waits to give you the answer until the end of the video, this takes an answer-first approach.

This works perfectly with our example from before about Hormozi on a podcast.

If his answer to “What is the greatest skill to learn?” was:

“The single greatest skill you can develop is the ability to stay in a great mood in the absence of things to be in a great mood about.”

That can serve as the answer at the top of the pyramid.

Then, he could support it with key arguments as to why that is the greatest skill to learn. All you have to do is ask why 3-5 times and provide solid reasoning.

After that, he can give examples from his own life, data about being in a great mood, or anecdotes from clients.

So, this is a great way to either expand on key points in a newsletter, thread, or YouTube video. And of course, it can be used as a way to respond to questions on a podcast.

Start with a great idea, make an argument about it, then support it with data.

Now, if you struggle to continue writing or speaking, this next framework will help with that.

Advanced – Cross Domain Synthesis

This one is my favorite because I have multiple interests.

It’s hard for me to stick to one topic or niche. I love studying psychology, philosophy, business, design, tech, health, and really anything that gives me the tools to live a better life.

This is how I tend to structure most of my newsletters, outside of the ones where I am focused on a singular topic (like this one).

Here it is:

Problem and amplify – your introduction should state a relatable problem and illustrate what happens if that problem is not solved.

Cross-domain synthesis – note patterns or concepts from your other interests that help support your argument. If I’m talking about deep work, I can use the concept of entropy from physics to illustrate how distraction works. This teaches my audience something new, and I can sleep well knowing that all other deep work content out there does not do this.

Unique process or solution – give a list of ideas or steps that best solve the problem you introduced at the beginning, solidifying the transformation. These should come from your own contemplation rather than someone else’s prescription.

In practice, you would have the title of your piece, the introduction with the problem, a section that teaches a concept from another discipline or interest, then a unique way to solve the problem in the form of multiple sections describing each key point.

The problem here is that this leads to something very long like a newsletter, book chapter, YouTube video, or even a solo podcast.

If you’re just starting out, you’ll be staring at a blank screen because you don’t know how to fill in each section.

Luckily, writing is like legos with ideas, and ideas come in predictable forms. If you understand those forms, you can guide your mind to brainstorming what to write next. Here are a few easy ones:

Pain point – if I don’t know how to start a section, I start with a relevant pain point, and ideas start to flow from there.

Example – once I’ve started a section, you can throw an example in anywhere. This grounds what you are saying.

Personal story – think to a time in your life that relates to what you are writing about. This can go anywhere.

Statistic – research a truthful statistic that adds more authority to your point.

Metaphor – explain a complex idea as if you are talking to a child. Alan Watts is incredible at this.

Quote – include a quote that justifies what you are saying. Quotes are easy because they are almost always great ideas.

Reframe – give people a different perspective on the point you just discussed.

What, how, or why – when all else fails, simply ask what, how, or why? Thinking is questioning.

These are the “legos” that compose most of my outlines. I tend to cycle through all of them in my head. Once you get the hang of it, it becomes second nature, and your thinking process starts to rewire.

I hope that was helpful enough to get you started.

– Dan

Here are further resources for writing and articulating yourself:

相关笔记

🧭 主题 MOC

  • [[创作系统 MOC|创作系统]]:(MOC) 围绕「表达」训练的写作/口头表达框架与方法论汇总,归入创作系统的核心能力。

🎯 表达框架:结构先行

  • [[40 Library/41 读书笔记/麦肯锡结构化战略思维/2024-03-31-18-29-03|金字塔原理图示]]:(麦肯锡结构化战略思维) 用「金字塔原理」做“结论先行”的分层展开,对齐文中的「Pyramid Principle」。
  • [[40 Library/41 读书笔记/麦肯锡结构化战略思维/2024-03-31-18-35-51|提炼与清晰阐述]]:(麦肯锡结构化战略思维) 通过「提炼」+「清晰阐述」避免掉书袋,把“听起来聪明”落到“讲得明白”。

⚙️ 训练与复利:写出来才会说

  • [[30 Wiki/32 创作_表达/2024-03-01-20-48-47|写作=训练]]:(Wiki) 把写作视为「训练」来更新认知参数,解释为什么持续输出会提高「表达」稳定性与可迁移性。
  • [[40 Library/41 读书笔记/输出力/2024-09-17-16-01-40|三句落脚点]]:(输出力) 先抓少数高价值句子当「落脚点」再展开,类似先准备可复用的“inner album of greatest hits”。
  • [[30 Wiki/32 创作_表达/2022-10-25-21-30-15|Done>Perfect]]:(Wiki) 先把「框架」写出来再迭代细节,避免完美主义让表达一直停留在脑内。

🔗 抽象母题:清晰=减熵

  • [[30 Wiki/33 商业_创业/P- 沟通能力决定是减熵还是增熵,需要重视并刻意练习|沟通减熵]]:(Wiki) 把「清晰表达」视为沟通的减熵工程:信息尽量无损传递,减少误解与返工。
  • [[30 Wiki/32 创作_表达/2022-10-27-09-34-06|简单更有力]]:(Wiki) 训练把复杂观点压到「简单」底层逻辑,是“articulate”的核心能力。

⚔️ 哲学对立:真相/实践 vs 话术/表演

  • [[30 Wiki/33 商业_创业/P- 重视 facts > 认可 > ego|facts > 认可 > ego]]:(Wiki) 与其追求被当作“聪明”,不如把「事实」放在「认可」之前,防止表达滑向自我包装。
  • [[30 Wiki/38 认知_思维/2021-05-21-07-49-42|嘴炮型“沟通技巧”]]:(Wiki) 警惕只学框架而缺少一线练习的「表达」,最终变成“坐而论道”的嘴炮。

📋 讨论归档

讨论进行中…